Its not newsworthy that Fox News is a cancer. We need to start highlighting similar infractions done by “trusted” media outlets such as CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, etc

The left and right MSM outlets both do this. Which is why i’ve been relying on more independent media outlets.

It doesn’t really matter what the deal was for. Corruption is corruption. This is not a left vs right issue.

His “success” is not the success Cranston is referring to. How don’t you get that?

You misrepresenting what Cranston meant is not reflective on him. His message was clear to me and in no way did I mistake that for Cranston supporting Trumps goals such as repealing ACA

No, that is not what Cranston said. He’s not equating “success” with Trump achieving the goals he laid out during his campaign. He simply wants Trump to be successful in doing whats best for our country.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with what Cranston said. However unlikely it is, we should all hope that Trump will do what is best for the country.

I think they may be referring to Manafort’s previous work in Podesta

you are correct sir.

No, Congress will support Pence because he is “business as usual”. And that is the scary part. Republicans would be able to quietly pass bills with little coverage from MSM. Trump does not give a shit about traditional republican ideals. Pence does.

intent matters. regardless of effect, i can’t confidently say he was intentionally trying to offend and neither can you

While Cam is well known to be immature and should have absolutely been more mindful of his words, I’m uncomfortable with the reaction this has received. You can tell that he was giving a genuine reaction as opposed to intentionally belittling the reporter. However, the reporter does have a right to be offended as I’m…

Why would you shoot someone who is running away from you?

listen fool... my point was to use that same line of thinking towards the russian investigation

wrong. the correct answer was berniebro.

you’re playing semantics when you know exactly the point i’m trying to make...the point you made was why kill him after he already released the info.. which i’m saying makes no sense at all

Your argument makes absolutely no sense. Why kill Bin Laden then?

Your statement makes less sense. How can the prevent something they wouldn’t expect to happen?

Questioning Seth Rich’s murder does not equal asserting that Hillary Clinton or the DNC murdered him. The media has done a terrible job convoluting the two.

There is absolutely no way you can call the Seth Rich conspiracy unsubstantiated, yet completely buy into the Russian meddling narrative pushed by the media (assuming you do buy into it).