Coming from the same pseudo-journalists that don’t spellcheck, or use ‘woman’ where ‘female’ is grammatically and linguistically correct, you lot have no legs to stand on.

Then use your stupid fucking precious 2nd amendment and do something about it.

Really? An entire article about how dumb you are and your ego’s futile attempts to justify your sub-standard intelligence?

Seriously, how do you get a job writing, when the grammar and sentence structure in your headline is utterly incorrect?

Prove it, fucktard.

Funny, lots of people say that, and yet have no such respect for family members or friends, when it comes to euthanasia/ self-assisted dying.

We all know that this is the case; so we shouldn’t be allowing them entry under any conditions into a more civilised country, because they act and behave like animals from the Middle Ages.

Too much oxygen you mean.

Isn’t it going to be easier on the courts to just jail all men? Then we can work on the Republic*nts that are equally as sexist despite having their own vagina’s.

Just use those guns your country has such a fucking hard-on for, and blow the Republicans and Tea-Party fucktards to the Kingdom Come they so desperately believe in.

Yet Yanks cower in fear or raise pitchforks at the mention of liberal democracy, socialism and worker ownership.

If she’d switch ‘teams’ I’m available...

How do you Americans STILL not comprehend that Religion is the root of every evil?

You really show your millennial ignorance when you use ‘woman’ instead of the grammatically correct “female”. If you think ‘female’ is the wrong word to use (it isn’t always) then just change the title so you don’t need to force the wrong word (woman) in.

As much as I despise that orange turd and everything and everyone he stands for and supports him, there is NOTHING in that stupid video to generate this obvious clickbait story.

I do. So long as it’s as good as the first one and nothing like the 2nd one.

Simple, 3 step plan to sort this shit out once and for all...

Well said.

Notice the inherent implication of control and authorisation in your words? You’re talking as a man, to other men and saying you want to “let” women have autonomy. As if it’s a thing you / men are in possession and control of.

Unless you’re taking about a model, no one in this story or on twitch is using their body as a ‘product’. You’re either woefully being naive or being obstreperous. And even if, someone - like a model did use their body as a product - rules, ethics, humanity, compassion and respect STILL APPLY.