The GOP isn’t pounding the table for drug testing leaders now? Shocking!

I don’t think you understand what crumple zones are. All cars will get smashed up in a wreck. Most cars these days are made to break and crumple in specific ways to absorb the impact and protect the driver. that’s entirely difference.

No, you got rear-ended by the bottom half of the class of your fellow citizens.

Right. By fleeing the scene, he prevented his employer and/or law enforcement from determining if he was, say, under the influence of something.

I once had a local Uhaul rental that lasted about 6 hours (we were preparing to move and I drove a bunch of stuff to the charity shop a few blocks away from our house, total trip might have been 4 miles) that, when I returned, they wanted to charge me like $800 for mileage ($1/mile). I argued with them for 45 minutes…

Hertz is doing something stupid and having it blow up on social media is as predictable as a rainy day in Seattle 

Even if that were true, he still stomped the gas instead of the brake which is what caused the actual accident, and then fled the scene.  Innocent people rarely run.

I too feel as though I got rear-ended by the government just last night.

He probably thinks it’s tough because a new cybertruck and this mangled wreck look identical.

Maybe everything looks like a bag of nails when you’re that big a tool?

“Cybertruck is tougher than a bag of nails” says man who is dumber than a bag of rocks and as useful as a bag of smashed assholes

Exactly. The tunnel is proof that FSD doesn’t work.

Every time I hear Musk talk about RoboTaxi’s or cars driving themselves I just point to the tunnel. If they can’t do it there in a 100% controlled space, in the absolute 100% best case scenario, what makes anyone think they can do it on public roads.

I would have preferred a slideshow.

Did THIS need to be capitalized?

Booby trapping your property with explosives would likely result in felony charges.  Just follow Mark Rober’s lead and make some stink/glitter bomb packages.

In this case, yes, the Turo insurance should cover this, IMHO (but I would not be surprised if they worm their way out of it). The insured is the owner of the truck, they are in the business of renting them, and it’s not like you can vet who is going to decide to be a vigilante with your truck. So Turo should pay out…

Right? That’s what I was thinking. Imagine if someone was shot and killed over some cheap trinket.

$30,000 in damage to save a $20 Etsy necklace! Huzzah!

I feel like this could have gone much worse for everyone involved.  Safer thing to do may have just been to follow the thief while on the phone with the police.