Then you STILL don't exactly taste of milk and honey if it's been awhile since your last shower either.

No decent medical body recommends circumcision outside of medically necessary circumstances, several countries have outright banned it aside from religious and medical reasons. It basically became popular as a method to prevent masterbation.

Female I assume? If so, suffice to say you don't exactly taste of milk and honey if it's been awhile since your last shower either.

That would be because it's the same audio

Given:

Don't waste your time. That lot are utterly incapable of differentiating between objectification in the limited "Oh hey she's got a nice ass" and giving a bit of a look sense, and the kind objectification represented by someone going out of their way to act like a woman consists of legs, ass and tits all tied…

Note the past tense and age indicated. Highschool was a while ago, and she's in new zealand last I heard. Which puts her shortish boat trip from being as far away as possible without NASA's help :P

Yea, first time I saw this ad, I was all "Oh one of those ads targeted at boyfriends/etc in hope to get them onboard. Mkay."

Frick, used to happen to me back when I cut my hair short and I'm a white dude. Especially right after a haircut. I've been literally tackled by a female friend want to run her hands through t because because "OMG IT'S SO SOFT YET BRISTLY" (Read that in your best 16 year old girl SQEEEEEE voice, fyi.)

-"What are PETA's euthanasia criteria?"

No no, definitely sarcasm. You can thank two separate halfway literate screeds in which I was informed that by linking a kitten video and eating something with honey in it, I was participating in the systemic of oppression of animals and that I should "Wake up." and "Check my privilege."

You, though apparently I've invoked Poes Law. I had hoped daenerys eye roll would cut it; what I get for basing sarcasm off actual encounters with animal right nutbars I guess?

It is a false happiness imprinted upon them through humanities tyrannical eugenics programs. Animals can only be truly happy in the wild, unfettered by humanity and no domesticated animal is capable of being liberated. Those smiles have been painted on their very souls and the only freedom they will ever find is death!

Of course not, what's the systemic oppression of half the worlds population next to the of atrocity of beautiful and free wild animals who have been perverted by humanity into happy doggies and kittens, by genetically enforced enslavement. We are selfishly denying them their heritage of hunger and the brutality…

See, now I want to parlay that into a modest proposal esque eat the babies argument, but that would be just a little too ridiculous >_>

Well yes. Dogs and cats and so forth are the perverted creations of mankind forced into happy enslavement. By slaughtering them as efficiently as possible they are simply rectifying the horrific anthropocentric arrogance demonstrated by humanity. After all those animals are not wild and can thus never be happy.

Can do. Not like there's a shortage after all. Have 2001 income tax returns including funding to the ELF

PETA has exactly zero interest in caring for animals. As far as they're concerned if it's been domesticated, it should be dead.

Because any non-wild animal is an enslaved animal. As dogs and cats enjoy and will seek out human companionship, they are forever incapable of being wild and thus need to be destroyed.

Would this be a good place to mention they like to support and fund domestic eco terrorist groups?