I like your persistent Warriors blowing a 3-1 lead better, but this one seems to be aging well.

As long as you’re sorry.

Hey, thanks Jim!

Doug Glanville always seemed like a really nice guy.

Am I the only one on Bobby Hull’s side here? I mean, that little girl was bogarting all the goldfish. Not cool.

This is one of the few pleasant conversations I’ve ever had on here. It wasn’t really Catholicism that lead me to agnosticism, more so just the way my brain works. So I shouldn’t blame Catholicism as it was inevitable, organized religion just pointed out hypocrisy to me. Still, I think there is much to learn from all…

I appreciate your well thought out answer, and it holds a lot of water, but I will insist that sneaking away from your parents is disobedience with or without a command to not do so. And if you interpret the temple story as him making a whip and driving people out, do you interpret that as him striking a person with a…

Not sorry enough.

I don’t understand why you feel the need to get snarky and combative towards me for suggesting that he add a comma and two words to an article to make it more intelligible to his audience and to better teach what the word means, but I will return the favor. Also, you teach someone a word by teaching them what it…

Yes, I do too, but he didn’t teach his audience anything. It was on you to look it up. The point is if an author is trying to teach his audience something, like a new word, he should do that. A simple comma and the words, “or untouchables” would have sufficed. That is all I am asking for and I don’t think it’s too…

You are very welcome.

Too lazy to write this 6 times so I will copy and paste like the lazy American I am. I’m familiar with the term untouchables and their caste system, which I think is enough of a basic understanding. When you write for an audience, it is your job to convey a message they can understand. The appropriate way to write…

Steps don’t count until he fully gathers the ball from the dribble, until that point he is still dribbling.

I know, such a jerk.

You are right. That is a totally fair representation of the entirety of the calls made by referees. I change my opinion to whatever you are trying to argue.

Too lazy to write this 3 times so I will copy and paste like the lazy American I am. I’m familiar with the term untouchables and their caste system, which I think is enough of a basic understanding. When you write for an audience, it is your job to convey a message they can understand. The appropriate way to write…

THIS. Logic would follow that since this is what most people know, an author should, you know, make his message intelligible to his audience.

Too lazy to write this 3 times so I will copy and paste like the lazy American I am. I’m familiar with the term untouchables and their caste system, which I think is enough of a basic understanding. When you write for an audience, it is your job to convey a message they can understand. The appropriate way to write…

Too lazy to write this 3 times so I will copy and paste like the lazy American I am. I’m familiar with the term untouchables and their caste system, which I think is enough of a basic understanding. When you write for an audience, it is your job to convey a message they can understand. The appropriate way to write…

I’m familiar with the term untouchables and their caste system, which I think is enough of a basic understanding. When you write for an audience, it is your job to convey a message they can understand. The appropriate way to write that would have been to say it made him a dalit, or untouchable. That is a reasonable…