bluetom00
bluetom00
bluetom00

So you don't mind using the word "gay" to mean "suck," even though it's offensive to gay people. Does that mean you wouldn't mind using the word "nigger" to mean "suck" around black people? Give that a try. Next time you're around a group of black folks, try using the phrase, "Man, that game is so nigger." See how

She was a medical intern, which would mean that she finished medical school, making her a doctor. Not quite the same as a summer internship at Jiffy Lube, and not something anyone can do without a lot of hard work and a good head on one's shoulders. Cusick's point is that that's evidence that she's a smart, talented

Fair enough— you'll benefit. But you're already paying Comcast to watch their TV service. My point was that this isn't a way to get back those customers who have given up cable TV service. Cable providers are losing subscribers because 1) they're unjustifiably expensive at a time when money is tight; and 2) smart

It's not the box that gives you access to HBO; it's you paying Comcast an extra $14.99/month that gives you access to HBO. If you don't have HBO now, you won't have HBO when it comes to the 360. Nobody's getting access to content they can't already access.

Ugh. This is disappointing, but not unexpected. Using the Comcast "app" will be restricted to Comcast TV subscribers. In other words, you can now use your 360 to watch things that you could just as easily use your cable box to watch. It's another (and ultimately unnecessary) option for people who already pay

Does that mean live feeds from the network's live broadcast?

@acemannw: Do you know what the United States' military capability was on the eve of war in 1941? Chile had a larger army than the United States. You've heard of Chile, right? Would you call it a military superpower?

@Kaiser-Machead: If "War is the inevitable result of being aggressive social animals," why are there hundreds of societies that go to war a great deal less than the United States does? Plenty of countries aren't involved in two catastrophically expensive and unnecessary wars.

@DeathcomFour: Right, because we'd have no other planes with which to defend our skies without spending this unbelievable amount of money to buy these planes, which will replace the proverbial last year's model, which is clearly incapable of defending us against all the large-scale air combat threats we face.

@Manuel Campo: Sure, because if we didn't buy all these fighters, we wouldn't have modern warfighting capability. It all hinges on buying these planes. That's it. Nothing else modern. Back to the Stone Age without these planes. Makes sense.

For $388 billion we could send every American to college for nothing. And then we wouldn't need these horrific things to defend our ignorance.

@haxorknight: Seconded. I want all this stuff now without having to deal with AT&T.

@CIM: I might have missed it in the iPhone blitz, but any word on new _hardware_ for iPod touch?

@DaiMacculate - impotentnerdrage.com: I don't think you're overreacting. I'm with you. The problem isn't that Kotaku posted this political cartoon; the problem is that Luke failed to put it in any context. Beyond that, he gave the post a title that takes a partisan position.

@wahrugene: Ok! Cullen Gray, Yale class of '98, Mexican!

@wahrugene: Yeah, lots of guys named "Cullen Gray" in Mexico. That makes sense.

Oh, hey, cool, Nathan Drake.

This is fantastic! The smartest thing I've seen posted on Kotaku— ever? Maybe. Great job.

Is there a word missing in the title of this article? I'm confused. And I have a Ph.D.