Spoiler alert!!!
Spoiler alert!!!
"Nobody would be playing on that server." - You, directly addressing someone who would be playing on that server.
And have literally nothing to do, because everyone wants to run the new content, not the Lv70 content.
I'd re-sub if there was a way to play on expansion-specific servers, with updated mechanics and graphics and whatnot. Like, can I just play BC? Can I just play BC where the level cap is 70 for everyone and we don't get ganked by bored Lv100's?
Calling an abortion a miscarriage is like calling a fat person "fluffy." You're demonizing a thing that need not be demonized and doing more damage than good.
I'm so calm that I spent my weekend doing things I enjoy. I came back to work Monday morning and part of my routine is checking Kotaku. My schedule is very generous with free time.
I'm perfectly calm, dude.
The kind of people who scroll to the bottom of a multi-paragraph comment for the tl;dr aren't the kind of people I want reading my comments anyway. If they are scrolling, see the text and then decide to read the rest, they'd see that I'm not repeating some trollish meme, so they would know I wasn't joking. If you…
See, that's the point. It's not a joke, it was never a joke. That is what it's about, but people who didn't want to have a valid discussion derailed the topic, made it about some asshats that no one likes, and then decided that instead of having a valid discussion with reasonable people, they were going to make a meme…
Honestly, I don't think it would have. Those people are known for blunt delivery, they're all very famous right now. (Well...Kathy...)
For weeks now, everyone has been laughing, poking fun and taking the easiest, lowest hanging fruit, pointing fingers at the people who NO ONE was even defending, while completely ignoring the very real, very valid points of the Gamergate inquires, because it's easier to laugh at the assholes than it is to have a…
If I had seen anything about it, I likely would have believed it, if not immediately then after some brief research. I understand that I am not representative of everyone, but everyone seemingly readily accepted it.
I feel like I underplayed the importance of sample size in my previous reply. I only found out about this from having a Facebook account, as many others I've encountered have. Facebook has a reach of over 600 million people, and if even half of them saw the Cosby story, that's easily a great deal more than would have…
Why is it easier to garner support from a user base of six-hundred million people (Facebook) than it is however many people read news papers or watched the news on television forty/fifty years ago?
My ex-girlfriend did the same thing. I couldn't say the sky was blue without her fact checking and asking for citations.
And that 665,000,000+ Facebook users saw it on their wall, not to mention Reddit, Tumblr, MyGram, Bookface, Twitbox 360, and whatever else the kids use to share their outrage with the world. Why are people more aware now? Because they are literally more aware now.
It also didn't hurt that in modern society, we've started to actually recognize victim blaming and other horrible practices. In the 1960's, there was no "victim blaming," because no one had identified that behavior as being something inexcusable.
You're telling me that Le Tumblr Army never watched Project Runway? They have a "plus-sized"season. Those girls were size 8-12.
I think it may be more geographically in my part of the world.
I dipped back into WoW via a reputable private server about a year ago, and that server was running the Cataclysm expansion. Before that, I hadn't played since WotLK was released and it was so boring/easy that it made me quit all together. Burning Crusade was the absolute height of WoW gameplay/difficulty.