blm30
Blm30
blm30

There is not a politician on earth who, if asked “can you be a feminist if you are pro-life” would not answer in the affirmative. It is a stupid question and a stupider answer, but it’s the only available one.

Hillary Clinton is hardly Margaret Thatcher. But they’re both women, so your point is totally valid, I guess. “This one time, England elected a woman and LOOK HOW THAT TURNED OUT, HUH?”

i’d be happy to vote for elizabeth warren over bernie.

I’m starting to think that Elizabeth Warren is the go-to hypothetical for people who want to defend against sexism in this election. Everyone says they would vote for her! She isn’t running, so it’s very easy to say that.

“That is why I picked him as coach. Lue just loves being stepped over”

Yeah, Nicki’s been doing the whole “I’ma be fucking your wife” and “tell Justin Timberlake that I am coming for Jessica Biel” for years and nobody cares. Most guys just go “oh that’s hot” and move on mentally.

The French have an unhealthy obsession with what Muslim women do, wear or fuck. Their continued obsession is a leftover from when they ruled large parts of the Maghreb, Levant and sub-Saharan Africa. They can't stand the fact that no-one cares for their bullshit about France being the centre of modernity and birth

Lol give me a fucking break. You don’t think i know the poor will be disproportionately hurt if a republican is voted in because these bernie or bust people are too fucking interested in protecting their principles than doing the right thing?

There are so many situations where I really question whether Bernie knows what the fuck he’s even talking about.

I know you so desperately want this to be true, but it’s not, it’s complete bullshit. I was going to give a huge response here (including how DADT and DOMA were stop-gap measures to prevent witchhunting LGBT military members and a constitutional amendment preventing gay marriage, and how the Welfare bill was awful but

I want him to be able to back up his platform with any kind of chance that he will get it enacted. That’s the reason Hillary is so popular: her agenda is a lot more modest, but she’s vastly more likely to get it done. In part because of the ground work she’s doing now to get other democrats into congress. Obama is

Bernie hasn’t been subject to the Republican smear machine yet, and I don’t really like his odds as a socialist (I know, he isn’t, but that’s not what they’ll say) who wants to raise taxes and do all that other “far left” stuff. He’s really avoided any sort of critical discussion in the mainstream of his platform, and

But he really isn’t activating them. Obama did that, and he clobbered Hillary in the primary. Bernie claims to be heading a revolution, but he isn’t even doing as well as Hillary did at this point in 2008.

In addition to what The Drama Llama said: a lot of moderate independents and republicans are more likely to choose a moderate Democrat over a far-left liberal. The primary season encourages the die-hards and the extremes, but there’s a reason the general is called the run to the middle. I don't see Bernie doing that,

Wat? No, the superdelegates are clearly backing the will of the people because 2.5 million more of them are supporting Clinton over Sanders. Their support is not directly proportionate to the voting splits among candidates - they support the majority victor. Period. Never in their existance have they not supported the

Bernie is totally going for super delegates right now-it’s been a strong theme now that he’s claiming “momentum”. And he is also going to face the same Republican hate machine that’s been trying to poison the Hillary well for the last couple of decades-you think he’s going to keep doing this well? Take a look at

At least they’ll be serving in Congress or their State Assembly or wherever!

Raising money is compromising? When AIDS Walks happen do you turn your nose up in disgust at Big AIDS selling out?

Excuse me. Hillary Clinton, upon being elected president, would become the defacto head of the Democratic Party and as such, she damn well better have “coalition loyalty from (the congressional) democrats” — it is not something that she is or should be expected to “buy”. Also, her “agenda” comes and will come and

Demanding that democrats, especially downticket races, forgo money while allowing republicans to drown them out with money is basically crippling the democrat and handing the majority of the victories to republicans. You need to completely overhaul campaign finance, and overturn Citizens United BEFORE there is an even