You dont own guns, and you have no intention to ever own guns. I get that. But for the love of god, do some damn research.

Automatic firearms or citizens without a need to own one are incredibly heavily restricted. You have to submit $200 bucks, fingerprints, and pictures to the ATF, as well as making sure the rifle…

So, in the case of this guy using what an FBI expert called a belt fed weapon(already illegal), the silencer probably would have saved lives. The sheer weight of fire would have melted internal components (if a suppressor with baffles) or would have deformed and damaged the weapon(if one with a metal baffle system).…

What the article fails to mention:

The gun he used was a belt fed automatic weapon (Identified by an FBI expert. The cadence used was typical with either and RPK or an M60). These weapons are already Illegal to own without going through a ridiculously restrictive process that requires you to have a reason to own it.

Aft…

No, if anything I proved heavily restricting something works. Proving Gun control works would require me significantly reducing the murder rate through the restriction of guns. We have a decent bit of evidence that the opposite happens. See the U.K. The total ban (or heavy heavy restriction) of firearms always sees a…

True, but that’s for a personal purchase. I set up a trust.

Obviously suppressor makers want a boost in profits. I dont see how thats the main point of this.

Groups should be looking for the benefit to them. For instance, as a gun owner, I like to put suppressors on my lower caliber weapons. This includes pistol calibers, as well as 5.56, 7.62x39, and similar sized cartridges.…

You realise that’s in most states getting a suppressor simply requires a $200 tax stamp, in addition to the cost of the item? Like, its not even illegal, This just makes em cheaper and easier to get.

Actual translation: They allowed us to look at their records to cross reference suspects that may have been deported for similar crimes. They also allowed us to cross reference anyone who was denied a Visa into the US due to a criminal record in their home country.

Stop being so Anti-Police you can’t see the big…

How do you know he would actually leave? The man already proved he didnt give two shits about our laws, so why take the risk?

His actions had consequences. That they are this severe sucks, but his inability to go to his daughter’s funeral is owned by him and him alone.

still with the name calling. I wonder if you add it after a thought, or this actually makes you so angry you pace afterwards.

Anyway, While removing Unions is a wonderfully American thing to do, I dont think its going to help in this situation. The problem with conviction is not usually the unions fault, it lies in the…

5-10 hours of non-police work on police forces so strapped for cash they use civil forfeiture to make up to 25% of their fund, sometimes more? Yea, not going to happen. Those communities that NEED police to do community work dont have the money to let cops do so. Those that dont (more rural areas) already have the…

So if a person is X (cop), they must be Y (racist)? That’s called Affirming the consequent, and it is a logical fallacy. Most police are just good people looking to give back to the community. There are racist cops, and for the most part they do get dealt with. Most cops get fired, some long suspensions. Some do fall…

As I understand it, the official story is that he recreated a crime scene to capture on video what he found. He would still be fired for this, but it’s not near as bad as planting evidence.

That made you walk around for an hour? Thats a weak...whatever you got there.

I’m guessing accidental shooting. They say he ran into an adjacent room. If he tripped on something in that room and fell, depending on the pistol (anyone know if it was a cheap high point or something more solid?) the pistol could have accidentally discharged. Depending on how he fell, it could have resulted in a…

Yea, terrifying results. Like enforcing our own immigration laws. Bastards.

1) an unlikely scenario, but thats why cops have partners. the cop with a rifle had backup.

2) Gunman kills the hostage, which defeats the point of a hostage in the first place.

3) given the description was “man loading a rifle in walmart” that’s highly unlikely. Terroistic actions then to target large group anyway.…

Armed man in the store with a rifle! Quick! Let us spend precious time looking at the shitty walmart cameras and alert the possibly unstable man to our presence!

Unstable people dont always just immediately start shooting. For all they know he was talking to satan about the right time to start killing.

One of the…

Of course they won’t press charges. The cops didnt know that THIS

Oh how i welcome our Amazon overlords. DEATH TO THE GOOGELITES

Oh how i welcome our Amazon overlords. DEATH TO THE GOOGELITES