bland1001
blandusername101
bland1001

It’s for rich kids who are poor?! SMH

Thank you for this. Reading West’s essay really left me scratching my head and your post has made things much clearer.

“Nor do you have the right to judge them for said decisions.” This is exactly 100% wrong. You have the absolute moral obligation to judge other people and to use those judgements to direct your own conduct. Otherwise your life has no meaning or purpose at all.

Kate Winslet is worth $90,000,000.00. If any of your friends is worth half of that then they are assholes for working for Fox. The only good reason to be obscenely wealthy is so that you can make decisions about how to live your life without reference to money. IN FACT unlike your friends Winslet claims to have

Your characterization of what I have written is entirely false, as I have explained repeatedly.

I HAVE answered you, repeatedly.

My purpose has been to discern why Zimmerman walked. It matters why as you cannot solve a problem that has not been correctly diagnosed. Diagnosing the problem as “white privilege,” while obviously correct, is too shallow and general to be of any use in solving the problem. Racial disparities in sentencing is a

My purpose has not been to prove MisterPiggins or dha65 or you wrong. My purpose has been to discern why Zimmerman walked. It matters why as you cannot solve a problem that has not been correctly diagnosed. Diagnosing the problem as “white privilege,” while obviously correct, is too shallow and general to be of any

I wonder why you waste your time talking to “morons” when you are omniscient.

It is criminal how much we do not know:

The argument between MisterPiggin and DHA65 is about the race of Mister Zimmerman. Is he brown or white? Both assume that Zimmerman’s race was the key factor in determining his acquittal. Here is a sentence where DHA65 demonstrates that belief, “My point is, he was definitely taken for ‘white enough’ when they didn’t

You are clearly right to assert that racist objects be confined to museums and books where they can viewed within a particular historical context BUT what do we do about racist movies? Recently, I was searching for a Christmas present for a girl who loves musicals so I watched the 1942 movie “Holiday Inn” because the

Assuming that you are not trolling, you might be interested to know that sentencing data does NOT back up your assertion that only white defendants receive light sentences for killing blacks. In fact, there is much evidence to suggest that in the US criminal justice system black lives are not valued no matter what the

I do not know anything about this but I am good at reading, “

Because many men believe that once you’ve said “yes” to one man who is not your husband/boyfriend (guys who “own” you, making you off limits) you are a slut who has lost her right to say “no.”

Yes! If I’d been this guy I would have said, “Sorry, I’m off the clock.” And if she’d persisted I’d have become surlier.

It is not illegal, so please do look at the “diversity” candidates a little longer.

I agree, but, as you have no doubt observed, gross ethical breaches are on the rise in 2017 and they were already at a very high level. As a general rule, executives understand that they should not disclose disparaging, controversial, or confidential information about their employers to strangers or even untrustworthy

There are many adults who “hang out” (does this mean “comment on blogs”?) on the internet (you might be one of them, I can’t tell) and many adults think that “dumb shit”, like getting fired from a high-paying job, actually matters. Your comment provoked a chuckle and an eye-roll at how odd internet strangers can be;

Letting slip something as controversial as, “We don’t believe the rape victims,” to a random stranger is called being very bad at your job. She could have been a reporter for the Washington Post or a lawyer for one of the victims or a lawyer for Masterson or a rape victim. He deserves to be fired for being an idiot