blahblahblah7629
BlahBlahBlah7629
blahblahblah7629

My phone lasts all day, I can charge it wirelessly at night without fumbling with cables.  Less fumbling means I am more efficient and productive.  This article shouldn’t be here.

What has Lifehacker come to? A few years ago, there were actual good articles here.

In the example given it took 14.26wH to charge the phone. Multiplied by 365 (once a day for a year) gives about 5200wH, or 5.2kwH. My city rates (which I understand are pretty cheap) are $0.10300 per kwH, giving a yearly cost of $0.53/year. The article says wireless charges are about half the efficiency, so figure a

Didn’t think so, this isn’t like dinky shits and giggles photos, you cobble up using software. Every photon you miss degrades the image,

He’s not wrong. He’s just bitching. That photo you posted? It’s also a composite. Because stacking and compositing is how nearly ALL astrophotography is done. Which means he knows as much as I do that he can get rid of all of those satellite streaks via compositing. Which means he left them in by choice. Why? I don’t

Yes its a composite of 17 images but ALL of them had starlink traces on them. What he wanted was high quality final image by combining all the exposures but he couldn’t do that because the sats ruined his sequence

Ok, you all realize that that’s a composite image, right? The photographer selected the exposures which had a satellite pass through it and stacked them on top of one another. He could just as easily have selected the ones that didn’t have a satellite.

I’m not sure if you were being sarcastic, but...

They haven’t yet gone plaid!

Amazon, motherfuckers. Amazon.

ROKU, futhermockers. ROKU.

Widgets and being able to organize all the Apps more easily were the two big thing I was surprised to find missing when I moved from an Android to an Iphone. Glad they’re fixing that!

That’s not the liberal way! If they are offended YOU need to be also, otherwise you are a bad person. Taking away your freedom of choice ,trying to rewrite history, and tossing in a good helping of censorship is well within their wheelhouse.

If people have a problem with it, all they need to do it just watch, oh I don’t know, something else. Last I checked people had that little thing called a “choice” of what to watch and what not to watch. This whole thing is becoming more of an annoyance now (and not the kind where it brings people to change. People

Oh FFS. Now we’re going upset millions of preschoolers to teach cops a lesson? Paw Patrol is completely harmless to anyone that has seen it once. 

How do you sleep at night? It must be a non-stop nightmare to know that somewhere in the sprawling metropolis (and throughout the world), there are people watching, reading, and listening to entertainment products that don’t perfectly align with your values.

How about ‘if I don’t like what I’m watching, then I change the channel’?

Just what pluto should have done with Cops. 

> I’ve never *really* needed the police, so let’s abolish them
But - who will catch the murderous criminals and neighborhood vandals?
> Community outreach will cure those things so they don’t exist.

I’m gonna go out on a limb and suggest you probably live in a safe neighborhood and have never in your life dialed 911.