bison78
bison78
bison78

Nothing with butterfly doors is ever the “non douchiest” anything, except the Toyota Sera and maybe the Autozam AZ-1. It’s still a good choice. 

Sticking it in the corner of your windshield?

they infringe on my right to privacy

Sorry but I don’t get it, surely it’s the look of the license plate that ruins the front end, right? I don’t see how this wrap changes that. FWIW, I’ve never had a front plate on the 5 cars I’ve owned here in California. Most car people here consider it a $25 beauty tax if you get a front plate ticket.

2nd:

The one in Arizona is the real thing.

I had to check and make sure this wasn’t a previously published article.

It’s still a pedestrian crossing, even if it wasn’t painted, and even if it was painted illegally.

A fact I wish this article mentioned - these are ALREADY legal crosswalks. Any non-marked intersection is... you guessed it.. a legal crosswalk. The paint just makes the legal crosswalk easier to see. These “illegal” paint jobs are likely not creating new crosswalks, but highlighting existing non-marked crosswalks.

More accurately, it compares to rationing the amount of fuel you drive away with, which gas stations have done in the past.

with a multimeter. you dont need to put power through something to know if its working. itll measure correctly if its working.

Unless you’re literally rich as fuck, you’re not gonna get L3 charging at home. PERIOD.

Sounds like 80% is a pretty good default setting then. Plus, it’s probably better for battery management.

The thing is most people that are on a road trip will usually stop charging at 80% anyway. Because of the way that charging tapers dramatically at the end of a fast charge cycle, that last 80% takes a relatively long time compared to the first 80%.

YES! It’s that Doctor Strangelove level of paranoia that antifa will steal and impurify their precious bodily fluids.

If you’re getting your kicks knocking down the writing in grandma’s Facebook post that’s one thing, but is it so much to ask that (ostensibly) professional writers take a bit more care in their craft?

Nothing to see here.

This must be one of those “over-the-air updates” I’ve been hearing so much about.

Wow, that was pretty wrong.

They’re so stupid for the copyright infringement claim, since in any news coverage that would be ‘fair use’ footage totally legal to use.