I don’t think your Southern Strategy will pay off here...
I don’t think your Southern Strategy will pay off here...
Extreme polarization.
“Americans have a nasty habit of simply not turning up to the ballot when they don’t like either candidate. We’ve seen that in election after election, where someone who doesn’t have popularity among the voters wins simply because of low voter turnout.”
Paying attention to only one poll to make a point is a mistake. Not saying your conclusion is wrong, just that the reasoning to get to it is flawed.
It’s hard to square that statement with the fact that Cook Political and David Wasserman have her as among the ten most liberal senators during her tenure based on her voting record. So either the people who have spent their entire lives researching politics are wrong, or you are.
Good scoop. Nobody will believe that Donald Trump once had an affair.
U r cool and good at photoshops
Yeah, except that adults who talk about sex acts don’t talk like a bad writer’s conception of a pimply 16 year old who learned everything he knows about sex from his friends who also don’t have any.
Which Deadspin staffer are you?
I feel honored to have met the first male older than me who has never heard anyone talk graphically about wanting to fuck someone else—assuming you’re being honest, anyway. Either that, or you’re a smarmy faux-feminist loser.
I don’t usually do this, but I have to call bullshit: You’re a 40 year old man living in the world today and YOU’VE NEVER ONCE IN YOUR ENTIRE LIFE been a party to a conversation where people were talking about fucking other people?
For how many/much of those wins do you think Francona was directly or indirectly responsible? It’s a reasonable question; most advanced analysis suggests managers at best or at worst are responsible for +/-6 or 7 wins over the course of a season. Do you think those 6 or 7 wins were all during the playoffs?
No. The market dipped but then fully recovered. Aggregators are at the same levels they were this morning. And betting markets have Hillary at roughly 1% lower to win than yesterday.
I know Gawker is gone but this is where you ended up? Which former Gawker staff writer are you, exactly?
Then you’re making people who want to go to college but might also want to pursue a real professional future in sports choose one or the other. That seems deeply unfair to the students/athletes (who couldn’t really be student-athletes), but it’s also not really fair to the schools, who should have every right to…
Oh man, I’m sure you hate all the work Deadspin has given you in the form of debate coverage. Have fun thinking you’re making the world a better place.
Right, except that 43% of the country would vote for whoever has the (R) next to his or her name. Hillary losing those people, plus a few more to Johnson/Stein, doesn’t make her a shitty candidate. It just means we’re living through a time of unequalled entrenched polarization.
There’s no math to back up what you’re saying. Pitchers like Kershaw are the very reason otherwise mediocre teams are able to reach the postseason in the first place.
Probably the guy who’s won multiple championships. But maybe I’m projecting?
Quick Rundown: