It can be both.

He took two steps before making contact with Paul. The defender should be able to change his path in that time. If he can't, it's because he's out of control.

How so? It looks like Paul is almost completely stopped. But even if we were to assume Paul was moving, contact by two moving players is a foul on the defense.

You might think Cam’s a bitch, but your first two statements are complete non sequiturs. Is he a bitch because he makes millions of dollars? Or are job requirements one of your hot button issues, where you regularly flip out at the Taco Bell person for not offering hot sauce? If it’s the latter, I’ve got good news.…

“But a free throw is shot from the free throw line. And it is FREE.”

“Shaq, D. Howard, D. Jordan et al are not really trying to make their free throws with the terrible form they shoot with.”

The worst part about the intentional fouling strategy is that it creates a platform for hot takers to say that players should “just make their free throws” or “practice fundamentals.” Why limit that kind of top notch analysis? If basketball players made every shot they took, this wouldn’t be a problem either. They…

Shaq spent more time practicing free throws than anyone else on his teams. They don’t miss free throws for lack of practice. It’s not a video game where you just level up. And great hot take on Lebron. I didn't think that if he improved a part of his game that he would be a better basketball player. What if he could…

You unlocked the secret. These basketball players just need to make their free throws. I don’t know why they haven’t done that yet. I mean, sure they’ve played basketball year round since the age of 10, and sure they shoot more free throws in a month than you have your whole life. But have they tried making them? You…

I think you’re missing the point. It wasn’t a question of whether or not Pistorius should be able to kill an intruder. It’s that when Pistorius fired with intent to kill the person behind the door, he's on the hook for murder if the person behind the door isn't an intruder. So your question should be "would you rather…

I think you’re missing the point. It wasn’t a question of whether or not Pistorius should be able to kill an intruder. It's that when Pistorius fired with the intent to kill the person behind the door, he's on the hook for murder if the person behind the door isn't an intruder. So your question should be: "would you…