Credit Karma does not give you your credit score. They give you some muddled credit indicator of their own devising.

They may be rolling it out over a period of time. Go into your apps and select the green Google Settings application - do you see "Android Device Manager" at the bottom? If not, it may not be enabled on your phone yet.

You don't need an app; it's available within a web browser. You'd need to be able to log into whatever Google account is associated with the phone.

VOTE: Crashplan

The only thing I'd give up vacations for is if I could work out some kind of semi-annual hiatus of a couple months.

Uh. Do you think the only jobs that exist on the planet are manufacturing or other tasks that can be handled by machines?

Obviously there are exceptions everywhere, but generally speaking, if there are no jobs in the area, it's probably better to move. This isn't an easy answer, but sometimes you have to examine the situation a little closer: how did you end up living in an area that has no jobs for you? Is this just an economic downturn…

Commute times are so often self-inflicted.

My hobby is photography. Consequently, the current lack of income from it is by choice and it's certainly something that could make me money.

If you have a touch screen, you can long press on the network to delete it.

I really wish we could get synchronized notifications across the board. I frequently switch between tablet/phone/laptop over the course of a day, and it'd be awesome to not have to dismiss notifications in multiple places.

I hate this line of thinking. "Why would you need privacy?"

Well, there is an element of trust, but you can add each others' accounts to your phones, and then go into the account settings and uncheck the pieces you don't want to sync.

What I'm saying isn't about ivy league schools - it's about carefully evaluating how much it's going to cost to obtain an education at <insert school here> and whether that will pay off.

All of the debt I see my peers paying off is astonishing to me.

I like this structure better.

The problem is the hot/cold issue was built up by describing it and presenting it from another source, then dismissed in just a few words. By the time you dismiss it, you already have a bunch of people who have formed an angry opinion. They may, at that point, either be skimming, or skipping, or just want to vent.

I never suggested they should comply. I was only responding to the comment that the service provider's cooperation provided everything necessary for the government to read the payload.

What?

So... you're of the opinion that the government should be able to see into any and every communication?