Yeah it read like a D+ review.

Did you see on the TV screen that the Speaker said there would be no second vote? Curious in how that fits into your absolutely fascinating (lol, i'm a nerd) discussion.

http://deadline.com/2016/06…

Mandel literally addressed this in an interview with Deadline:

Yes, sure, you're absolutely correct ; but I'm not sure she had much choice in the matter of timing for mass effectiveness. Also I think her time under the tortuous treatment of the church taught her a lot about prejudice , as much as Cersei can learn about others in a way not directly related to herself that is.

<3 you, Cersei. Look, I'm not advocating violence, but FUCK IT FELT GOOD
to watch someone nuke an entire homophobic religion to the ground. As a
queer person who has been for two decades discriminated against, severely gay bashed, made to feel second class legally, restricted in immigration and made to worry every…

But the Yeerks didn't eat the brain or permanently alter the person, just wrap themselves around it. Plus they had to escape and eat every 72 hours. I always wanted to be a human-controller lol.

I never disliked Agustin tho I understand why others migh because he paid consequences for his actions but he was practically a saint compared to Patrick in S2.

You find unfettered stupidity causing the deaths of thousands of people inspiring?

You mean Alston aka the worst TV reviewer of all time?

Lol. These chars were as homonormative as they come. As evidenced by anyone with eyes watching and by the kind of audience that the show attracted most fervently: basically anyone who supports the homonormativation of the queer community and privileged white gay males, which is basically a synonym.

Michael had a partner for three seasons who had it. They dealt with sex in an extreme and frequent but still hot way. That partner had whole storylines to himself tackling the issue with core and non core characters. Emmet thought he had it. Michael and his partner adopted a teenage escort who had it. They also…

I didn't say people who enjoy the show are. You lack reading comprehension. And yes a protagonist on a queer show has different responsibilities than one on a non queer show. This should be obvious unless you're in some homonormative bubble. Oh, wait, you probably are.

Omg. You're just arguing via fallacies now. You think all protagonists and shows are somehow equal? That the only solely queer show around tackling queer issues doesn't have a different responsibility than a show about the perils facing a white privileged straight man? K.

The show was an attempt to show normal gay lives or gay lives as normal. Therefore everything it was doing was validating gay men's behaviours as part of our community.

Yeah, read my comment below. I don't have time to argue with such obvious ignorance. The reason I'm glad this show is canceled is because it validated so many close minded privileged jacks like you in the community and allyship while challenging a sum total of zero of your suppositions.

I just rewatched all of US QAF and they handled it very well. The supposed lack of subtelty you mention was precisely the point. That show was incredibly risky to make at the time and they went full steam into every issue because they assumed that might be one of the last chances they had to tackle some of these…

No, he's not. He's kind of there while other people react to him. That's really poor characterization. The poz chars in QAF had actual sex loves and their own stories. The only thing they did with him was to poorly handle the PrEP issue. HTGAWM did it WAY better and without so much offensive handwringing (actually…

Couldn't one of those loose ends involve Patrick getting HIV? Seriously.

How do you suppose the survivors react when they realize Jon just went in all willy nilly and because of his emotions AFTER he was warned about Ramsay's devious side? Or does he just get a pass at all the lives he wasted because he has a penis and was acting brave?