billieholidayv6
BillieHolidayv6
billieholidayv6

I’m a bottle in, so boxed with work! Red only, please. Don’t forget the fries!!

To your point - Garry Kasparov, who is a fascinating follow on Twitter as well as an international chess champion and defected Russian, points out with elegant simplicity that Russian psychological warfare only exploits what’s already there.

Psychosis and pychopathy are two VERY different things. Please learn that difference.

That’s not what psychosis is.

Have you just officially named the dreaded drunken mid-fuck vom?

Yep. We don’t need more monitoring for SNAP; it’s already very well monitored, such that study after study shows abuse is very minimal. Adding any more oversight would be beyond the point of diminishing returns. And you’re dead on that it’s disingenuous when it gets compared to defense spending. Truth is, most efforts

Heard about it before. Read a lot about it actually. The idea of training kids and teachers to fight back against an armed threat just doesn’t sit right with me. First, because kids shouldn’t be and can’t be responsible for that burden. Second, because not all teachers are even physically or mentally able to do so

Makes you proud.

“Disick” is what you get when you combine “dick” with “sick”.

Honey, for real! I needs help.

They seem to be just fine letting themselves be ruled by emotions as long as it’s anger. Anger is manly, of course, so freaking out isn’t really being “emotional”. *EYEROLL*

Heh! It’s funny-but-not-funny, because I’ve met SO many of this same guy in my almost 50 years. He’s just a type. And they all idolize the concept of the emotionless Vulcan....

I used to be your husband. When I was growing up holidays were kind of like, “Oh no, not again.”

It absolutely blows my mind that Republicans can balance the cognitive dissonance of “look, an angry teenager is always just going to be able to somehow source a semi-automatic rifle, even if they’re illegal and rare and strictly controlled and almost impossible to get ammunition for, never mind that literally no

What he’s doing is cruel and unkind. He’s showing you who he is.

It is immensely unkind to say “we can be together now but at x point we’ll go completely dark and never speak again.” That sounds like a cruel and selfish move.

It’s wack that he didn’t acknowledge the gift and then went off on you when you asked him why he didn’t. That speaks to class and grace and I’d be out because of that.

Girl, I wish I could send you a vat of mousse. It’s lovely for drowning problems in.

While I understand this is awkward and unpleasant, it could be so much worse. It seems as though she has decided to withdraw from most interactions and is actually making herself scarce while not getting in your way. Some roommates are too present and take up too much space. I wonder, though, if you’ve ever tried