Seems they haven’t really mentioned a darn thing regarding why they aren’t prosecuting at all. Besides insufficient evidence.

Thing is...state law varies. Some self-defense laws actually allow for pursuit of an attacker since letting them go would potentially allow them to attack again.

You don’t have his ip address. One of you threatened me with that same crap.

What do you think about her suing?

This is really, really weird.

I don’t think the ‘equal force’ applies. Should the woman have to resort to fisticuffs?

Dude your link directly refutes it’s ‘always’ black deniers.

Dang. I didn’t think about that either. The telling him tobring the gun while it was just an argument.

There’s that, too, if it went that way. Definitely bizarre.

The suit seems pretty damn audacious.

No one said there aren’t black jew haters.

“And there’s Roseanne Barr’s holocaust denial which isn’t gathering as much headlines, but whatever....”

To be fair, eliminating the racial bias, in the latter case there was an actual physical attack. I’m still surprised they didn’t charge the kid for the followup shots though.

Seems to me he said the same thing you are. Even if restraint was necessary, it no longer was when he was unconscious.

Sounds like they’re being very thorough here.

So specific. He does look older though.

When’s a good time not to? I’d eat a bullet before I’d go.

It’s the lying about Tupac and smoking weed for me. I’ll never be able to let that go.

Did you do that? Made me chuckle.

How the heck is that relevant?