Did this article mention a lighter?

Can you explain this? Went shoom.

Almost the entire article is about that single example.

“If the likes of “ohhh, Bil ber!”, and his host of like-minded minions that are indeed are all over not just this article like cockroaches on leftover dogfood-and proceed to critique the writers of same like they are employed as boss editors-but others are as deep with them but at least the subject matter as of the…

Holy fuckin’ shit you manage some absolutely hilarious run-on sentences.

Ok...I see the...uh...logic...but where’s the fire starting crime? Arson is...ok wait so if like you say the kids were messin’ with a lighter...

Sincere question: how is ‘Fast X’ a ‘black movie’?

Dude. Shut the fuck up.

“Police said they don’t know what caused the fire but said it’s unlikely the children would have been injured if Moore “was not being neglectful.” Moore also was charged with arson, because the fire occurred while she was allegedly committing a felony, the arrest report said.”

Dude. Fuck. Getting out of this is a good one!

I heard he lit the fire and framed this bitch. You know...because black.

Does the one in the middle have Downs Syndrome? Why is her tongue always out?

The attempt to pin anything extraordinary on Florida is duly noted.

She’s charged with...arson? Wth? And how do kids get out of a ‘fullt engulfed’ car with only first degree burns?

“Illiteracy isn’t exactly an uncommon ‘capacity’ in conservative bastions”

https://spectator.org/maus-was-not-banned/

Doesn’t seem it had anything to do with the librarian at all. The school board reviewed some books and determined they were better suited for slightly older age groups.

You got most of it right and, well...this argument’s old. Yes, the kid’s a dick, and so maybe is Comrie.

“when she jumped over him”

No one is banning the bible. They’re just challenging it performatively.