God this is so transparent.

...

‘going postal’ doesn’t require firearms. But within those restraints, yes the US has far more gun crime than the countries you listed.

Well then Maybe Abbott has a point.

That’s actually not true. I offered suggestions of my own as well. Ultimately though I was curious what others’ suggestions were.

Yes, they do.

...

Welp, they’re doing it

“gun show loophole”

So that was stated about Hale, too, and the pronouns showed only when logged in?

Oh well. I tried.

“I told them I didn’t see the guy, but they said to look again, because he was in there and three other people had already picked him.” Vu said, “I picked Mr. Grant, even though I did not really feel he was the guy. However, I talked to my co-workers afterward, and they were all sure Mr. Grant was the person, so…

Can’t edit due to timeout. Wanted to add: After reading your bio and seeing the extent of your experience and expertise, my ‘nod’ almost sounds condescending. I had absolutely no idea. I don’t know if an apology is in order or not, but consider this something along those lines.

I’m not certain laws cut it. Murder’s 100% illegal. Using a gun to commit a crime is an enhancement in most jurisdictions.

Even as argumentative as I can be, I can’t even touch either of these points.

Sounds reasonable to me. I’d be fine with disallowings ALL vice advertising. We did it with cigs, kinda...sorta...

I understand. Wasn’t sure why the person I responded to questioned it.

Alright, so...we can agree that laws currently in place need to be enforced. They often aren’t for some reason.

Looks like this one might have been. But...a banker? That’s just weird.

Live streamed it, too? Man...this shit is bizarre.