Being out of your box isn’t a right, its a privilege. You don’t want to go back in your box, do you?

She was the best as Soufflé Girl. Everything else just failed to live up to that.

Yeah, right? People hate Newt? First I’ve heard of that.

Superman as the christ like figure is not new. Here is Richard donner’s Superman as christ like. Bryan Singer’s superman was Super christ like. Alex Ross the famous illustrator famously has in his Art Book a “Superman = Jesus” page.

Ugh, clearly that’s too thin to be Diana’s emblem. Can’t they bulk it up a little? It’s so petite. And what’s wrong with primary colors? Why can’t they just Lynda Carter’s emblem?

Looks pretty good. Going to be annoyed if she has a tiny role in that film and if not I am going to be annoyed they didn’t throw her name and logo into the main title (Like call it Trinity or something) with the other two.

Am I the only one who thinks Gemma Arterton might’ve been a good Wonder Woman?

Plus Scott Foley has the most punchable face in all of Hollywood.

This always seemed like a silly argument to me. If you have superhuman strength, your muscles don’t to be proportionally displayed as such. For example, if Superman’s muscles were supposed to be representative of his actual strength, then his arms would be the size of a cement truck.

Papa Pope is possibly my favorite character. His speeches are epic.

The cross section of actresses with more solid shoulders/arms that also fit the rest of the Wonder Woman profile is pretty narrow when you sit down and think about it.

Are those coconuts?

While playing Fallout 4................

Holy crap. He looks like Guy Fieri after lap band surgery.

I remember the good old days when Indy 1 & 2 were rated PG.

Basically, with enough lobbying, PG-13 just means “no sex and 1 f-bomb.”

PG-13 are usually pretty lenient on violence these days. They can be more violent than R movies, that are usually R because of the sex stuff and language.

To be fair, the rough cut of most two-hour movies is usually three or four hours long. But for the most part that’s because the movie hasn’t been whittled down to its essentials, not because there’s a lot of story that’s going to get cut out. Redundant scenes/dialogue, longer takes, alternate edits of sequences, stuff…

It’s actually pretty normal for a film to have a large amount of excess material that isn’t needed for the finished film. That’s what editing is for — to trim away the fat, to focus in on the core of the story. You’re always going to start out with a longer film than you need, and editing is like chipping away the…