I have only watched trailer 1 and 2, its hard not to watch the rest, but I need some surprises.
I have only watched trailer 1 and 2, its hard not to watch the rest, but I need some surprises.
Yeah... but neither of them will carry the hopeless of it and therefore lack the weight. Seeing Glenn bit it in the comics is the most powerful thing I've seen in comics. And it's a Whedonesque moment - you have to kill the most pure and good member (Book/Wash/Coulson/etc) to motivate the actions that follow. Killing…
I don't mind shipping.
You're one of my new best friends.
I will whoop for joy the moment they put an arrow through the heart of the Olicity shipping. So damned tired of hearing of it.
The LOOK on Ray's face when Felicity and Oliver were talking at the end of the episode; oh GOD I felt for the poor man, so hard, the feels.
The villain was Doug Jones :D
I dread the eventual day that Ollie and Felicity get together. They don't belong together just because they are the two leads, and I am sick to death of every show forcing that because of the 'shippers. They are as bad a couple as Mulder and Scully, and that was stupid.
Obligatory:
That wasn't the conversation at all. Eddie asked when will his opinion carry more weight than Joe's and rightfully so its when Eddie and Iris marry. Until then, Eddie isn't family and can up and leave whenever he wants.
Gut feeling: Maybe he gains his powers because of the way he died and was brought back. The Reverse Flash kills him by vibrating his arm through Cisco (using powers from the Negative Speed Force) while Barry brings him back to life by undoing that moment in time (using his Speed Force powers). Science babble, science…
Revenge fantasies for monstrous people are natural, but shouldn't be within the scope of the law.
You’re actual arguing points about Pacquiao that are supposed to justify this argument, are terrible and too few in number. You named a handful reasons why Pacquiao is also a moral “shithead” and only one or two of them are an actual arguable offense.
I think the idea that because an actor is gay he can only play gay characters, so if he was cast then the character must be changing is a total "Are you fucking kidding me" moment. If that were the case the history of theater, television and film would look a tad different.
I get your notion, but I do want to give a correction. BSG and Stargate were both on mostly before the WWE was on the network — so the WWE didn't 'pay for them.' (Nor did the WWE need to; both made the network plenty of money on their own.)
The "no humor policy" is a rumor too. Yes, that Warner executive said the the DCCU is aiming to be more "grounded" than Marvels, but he never talked about the movies having "no humor".
I'm not seeing anything remotely Nolan-inspired by this.
Without having seen it, you can't say it's dark for the sake of being dark, it's just an aversion to anything that's dark, period. Has it even crossed your mind that Bruce Timm has a particular story that he wants to tell and a dark, grim mood is fitting for that story? This just seems such a knee-jerk reaction.
This doesn't seem Nolan- esque to me. It's more Dark Fantasy, what with the New Gods and the Vampire
Does every edgy take on DC have to have a response like yours complaining about everything being edgy and gritty? Colorful and fun is the way some comics are, but gritty and dark comics have been enjoyed by fans since writers and readers started to grow tired of the CBA back in the 70's, and yet people act like…