They’re called implications. I suggest you learn more about them.

I’ll tell you the difference.

Thank you.

You know, I find the suggestion that being black is a much more terrible state of being than being gay to be absolutely repulsive.

Although all of us may not agree with that particular lifestyle for religious reasons...

I’m three years late to this, but this needs to be done again. I would submit Salt Lake City for consderation.

Would I be hated if I said I don’t care how much a douche he is?

So then, did Bernie go to rallies for votes?

It absolutely was. Her apology was, in itself, an admission that the Reagans were the antithesis of HIV/AIDS action.

If you’re going to jump on the “she’s evil, even though she has changed like 99% of society” bandwagon, you are inciting the argument that she is somehow unique, that Bernie is somehow different.

It wasn’t an omission. You’re creating expectations for something that no reasonable person would have expected, in order to sate the appetite of your peers for a Hillary bash.

Of course. He’s a privileged white man.

Which has zero bearing on the conversation at hand.

No, it wasn’t.

Oh lord, you’re a sad human being.

You’re wrong. He actively opposed same sex marriage, and even signed a resolution in Vermont seeking to “restore” marriage to what it “used to be.”

What is it with this Berner persecution complex? I don’t get it.

Everything is prepared with a Presidential candidate, you half-wit. Even the remarks you think are off the cuff.

I’m sure Bernie could tell us all about his broad support and acceptance for LGBT people, never having actively supported our causes and only recently having come out as pro-LGBT marriage?

Maybe he could regail us with stories of his committed support to the Human Rights Campaign since 2000? No?