biggayhomo
BigGayHomo
biggayhomo

Or stilts...

It's a Scandinavian person with wheels, then.

And the crack team who will pilot it.

I would rather have a pneumatic tube connecting my home to the beer store.

I imagine that if this had happened 150+ years ago. "Sheriff pulls over covered wagon of poverty-stricken family after baby found dead due to harsh conditions, takes away kids and arrests parents." Despite the improvements to our society, a lot of Americans are still struggling just to live.

Sephia in Sepia!

Just looks too generic. When Pontiac first announced they were going to put out a new GTO I was very excited.

One point : the critical communication and signalling wiring in planes is wrapped in a metallic wiring sheath in the main loom, to shield it from external radio interference. (also to prevent chaffing where it passes through frame components). It's like an expanding metal 'sock' that the cables run through. Think of

Take a look at the cabin. All the important bits of communication lines are easily 10-20 feet away from where the average device would be. Take your device and move it 1- feet away from your speaker, and you'll hear nothing. The electromagnetic field they create is not strong enough to adversely affect components 5+

I love how you can deny other peoples opinions when you can't even support your own.

While this may seem to make sense to you, if the plane was using crappy consumer grade unshielded (and in the case of audio also unbalanced) wiring your cell phone would be the least of your worries. Here's the deal, people don't like giving up their freedoms, even less so if it's for now legitimate reason. I bet you

I read through a lot of it. Most of it was Lithium Ion batteries catching on fire (which is a greater risk than interference). The few examples of interference seemed largely anecdotal without any attempt to prove interference. If the compass allegedly goes wonky because an iPhone is on, and gets better when it is

I haven't turned my phone off on a plane in over 4 years now... and I fly at least once every other month... none of my planes have crashed. Also, your argument actually makes no sense at all.... and other's have already covered everything I'd have to say. And yes, I'm an Electrical Engineer.... I do know a few

Remember back in the day when the first iPhone came out and people were using it in iPod docks? The docks made those horrible noises from interference especially due to AT&T's Edge network. Then a magical thing happened and suddenly the new docks that were labelled for iPhone use stopped having the issue. Guess what

I'm gonna have to call bullshit on this one.. The reasons are nowhere near technical.

So let me get this straight you are comparing the electronics of a 100-400 million dollar plane to that of 20$ computer monitors with unbalanced audio inputs and cables that have practically no electro-magnetic shielding? If your theory were correct, if you were at a large wedding wouldn't the DJ's speakers sound like

Dear sir. Do you know what analog and digital signals are? Your example is showing the effects of digital interference on an analog signal. Analog signals are extemely prone to interference because the signal they tansmit is dependent on the exact voltage passing through the wire. So any nearby electromagnetic wave

Lawl. I was going to post a long-winded comment about how embarrassingly wrong you are, but I see others have done that already. How's it feel to look like a total ass?

Did you know that electromagnetic wave power decreases at the power of 3 respective to distance? Do you understand what that means? Moron.

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about... All of the equipment in the cockpit is shielded from radio signals to avoid interference. No number of mobile phones can affect the equipment despite your extensive 'scientific' experiment that you seem so proud of. And do you really think an airline or an