Because the sources are quoted as saying the board “refused” to hear his appeal. “Refusal” is different than ‘rejecting’ the appeal for failure to meet criteria. But admittedly, since we’re getting hearsay reports of what happened and not an official report, some people don’t realize that “refusal” means something…

I never said they were my words - I just googled and found an analogous argument and posted it.

Someone else has already pointed out the fact that being given the chance to appeal is not the same as requiring the appeal to be heard.

You can’t even dream of keeping up. “Hearsay” referring to the “sources close to the investigation.”

Also - sorry about your insomnia!

He was? How do you know?

Yes, I do. Were I getting paid to provide an opinion on this subject matter I would put a hell of a lot more effort into it. Lexis, AG opinions, state statute, school policy. But you’re too dense and invested in branding this kid a rapist because you don’t even have the foundation of any facts whatsoever to pass…

If you say so.

Thanks. It’s actually my only point; we have no idea what happened, other than he was expelled. I’m getting tired of straightening everyone out about all the other strawmen.

You think I’m going to log into lexis to impress some jezebel kinja warrior on the internet?

enjoy. theft is treated same as assaults.

Bless your heart.

You’re not “explaining” anything to me, lol. This stuff is my job.

lol, you can’t stop.

Who wouldn’t be happy with a little anonymous Judge Dredd justice?

Bless your heart.

Oh I understand these things much better than you.

You don’t know the basis for his deficient appeal, period.

You don’t even know that. All we know is that he’s been expelled and the info in the reports.

lol you think private institutions can do what ever they want?