Thank you. And here I thought I was the only person with this sort of stance. I oppose the death penalty. Not because I think all human life is sacred, or because I don't think anyone deserves to die. There are some seriously terrible human beings out there who 100% deserve to die, probably quite painfully.

I have prepared a handy list of tips on how to protect yourself from potential exposure to the Ebola virus:

Don't worry good people, the doctor is here! Now, Ebola...that's the one that gets you humans pregnant, right?

it looks like disney ebola

I'm guessing the reward for each question was reduced by roughly 20% as well.

"...because EVERY LIFE IS PRECIOUS."

Except pro-choicers aren't the ones trying to re-define human life, the anti-abortion crowd is. Historically, the general belief (and Christian teaching) has been that fetuses don't count (or get souls) until quickening, and thus abortion before that point was more or less okay. The idea of "a person from conception"…

Stockholm syndrom. I almost feel bad for her.... she was basically indoctrinated into a cult from birth.

Oh no. Here's how being a religious, God-believing person works. You go and you pray to whatever form of God/representative of God you believe in. Then you go and you live your life in a way that speaks to that belief. Then you SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT.

"pre-born"

A alleged perpetrator's past documented proto criminal and criminal behaviors are relevant, whereas the victims past is irrelevant to a perpetrator's behavior. Considering your odd property crime analogy previously used in this thread, maybe this will help: a accused robbers past pickpocketing is relevant, while their…

I have the feeling these are the kind of women you wouldn't really want to marry in the first place.

For those who don't follow youtube very closely, this is yet another link in a chain of horrible allegations against youtubers who have large (predominantly teen) female audiences. These range from soliciting child pornography (adult vloggers getting nude pictures from their underage fans), to abuse, to rape. This…

The WOMAN WHO WAS RAPED WAS THERE. That makes *HER* account more valid than YOURS.

You cannot lock him up and throw away the key because of "other things he is rumored to have done" (actually not rumored but recorded on tape) but you can ABSOLUTELY speculate and draw reasonable conclusions about the likelihood of sexual assault when there is a known sexual predator. The mistake you're making in…

It's hilarious that you keep using that as some sort of "gotcha" as if you cannot possibly grasp the difference between a woman's consensual sexual history and a history of sexual assault. We're talking about a propensity to rape here, and the likelihood that a known sexual predator assaulted a woman. What on earth…

What happened to your brain that made it so dense. It was a clever quip not an actual call for his immediate arrest you moron. I don't have that kind of authority, he will have his unfair process, since we don't prosecute rape cases very well in this country and probably get away with a crime he probably committed.…

...No. Being a misogynistic douchebag and backpedaling by focusing on issues that affect men is misogynistic. For example: the assholes on Reddit who donated to a charity organization for prostate cancer in Jennier Lawrence's name. Domestic abuse against men is a serious problem, but the narrative he used suggests…