Well it only has four chords, which is definitely a Pop approach, but yes, it's not I–V–vi–IV.

But, sadly, when you saw your baby crying hard as babe could cry, you didn't know what to do.

Grotesque goblin muppets to boot.

I love "Underground", "As the World Falls Down", and "Dance Magic", but the rest of the album is completely disposable. Collectively his film contributions would definitely make a hell of an EP ("Absolute Beginners" and "Cat People" anyone?), which doesn't even get into the issue of the Low album being developed out…

To enumerate, off the top of my head:
1. Racial discrimination in housing.
2. Sexual assault (multiple instances).
3. Hiring undocumented workers.
4. Invasion of the privacy of pageant contestants (some minors).
5. Defrauding "students" of "Trump University".
6. Bribing a Florida attorney general in relation to item 5.
7.…

But… but.. what if we have questions that only a scientician can answer???

Perhaps, with some bloodletting.

I would like to imagine that later on in the galaxy far, far away documentaries about the events of the rebellion against the Empire completely dominate their equivalent of History channel programming, the way WW2 and Nazis do for ours (other than the random reality shows).

Also a way more advanced approach to special effects than anything that came before other than 2001: A Space Odyssey. Effects are so ubiquitous these days that we forget they used to be exciting. Collectively the original trilogy has really never been surpassed for practical effects.

We shouldn't capitalize "congressman" because it is not the formal legal title of a "Representative" or "Member of the House of Representatives". In statute law and (at least sometimes) in legal opinions the titles are capitalized.

Contemporary US statute law also capitalizes "the President", so as far as I can parse out the title should be capitalized in formal legal contexts. Certainly a lawyer should not be criticized for doing so. This is, however, the full extent of matters I will defend him on.

Very true, no doubt.

I suppose it makes more sense than referring to the lower cases in which moveable type letters were once stored. I prefer the term "minuscule" myself.

I'll grant you that doing it at a reasonable pace is certainly a specialized skill. I just don't think it's that similar to complaints by a random sports fan who couldn't play to save their life.

Right, but many if not most of the people complaining could often realistically do the job at a vaguely comparable level of competency, which is very different than the armchair athletes and game-designers you invoked.

Although many of the errors are nit-picky nonsense, the ambiguities on antecedents are inexcusable, given that the entire justification for the atrociousness of legal style is precision of meaning. For a lawyer it is a worse sin than working for a "Predisent".

A fair point, though those things are much more specialized skills, not within the abilities of run-of-the-mill liberal arts graduates, who can be bought for a dime a dozen.

Grammarians don't like titles being capitalized unless they proceed the holders name. I strongly disapprove of this for the office of the US President for the following reasons:

And it takes a 2/3s Senate majority to convict, so unless you're stuck in some past America where senators occasionally put country before party you can guess that actual removal from office is pure fantasy.

I've heard CNN has a countdown clock. I haven't watched it myself, since I haven't been at an airport this week.