Voting has closed on Save A Chef (Saturday), after just 3 days. It also says that next week will be the LCK finale.
Voting has closed on Save A Chef (Saturday), after just 3 days. It also says that next week will be the LCK finale.
It also doesn't make any sense. Since the idea was that they were going to be bringing in the LP to Delmon as an audition for June, why would they make a vinyl LP - which haven't been made commercially for at least 25 years - for someone who might be hired to sing "this Friday". I.e., although, sure, it establishes…
I agree.
Now it's up.
So why didn't he? Did he say why? He's the reviewer, he can give it whatever grade he wants, and the expectation is that he'll do just that. Why's he holding back and giving it a pass? Very odd.
If someone actually *cooked* sushi then, yes, they should be sent home for not knowing that you don't cook sushi, it has to be raw.
Does anywhere know where to find the current vote tally for Save A Chef? (Or even the final vote tally for the previous week? Yes, I know about the 94/6 % break shown during the show, but anywhere to see what it is now?)
…that we know of, anyway. But good call.
So I gave it a B+.
Nor I. The chefs were very inventive with iceberg lettuce, much better than it warranted. That was genuinely entertaining, and satisfying. Then I, for one, found their dining out at the boat's restaurant very interesting: it's highly unusual, and it became an excellent challenge for the chefs to try to ma=tch its…
Even that way, it doesn't make sense if they stick to previous years' scheduling. Usually, the entire show, including finale, is shot months ahead. So how could real-time fans like us put someone back into the final LCK, when the final LCK has to come before the show finale so the last standing LCK chef can join in?
Have we met this Jordan person before? There didn't seem to be any explanation for him at all.
Yeah (if you can call it a name). Sorry, CJ. And thanks for the correction.
It was clear from Tom's attitude (and from his
blog last week) that the judges felt bad, and guilty, that they had let
Josie get away with it last week, not knowing what had actually happened (and
of Kristen's excessive integrity). So, other things being equal (or maybe
not even quite equal), Josie was going to get it…
He was an important character on Deadwood - Silas Adams. A mixed, fairly good guy (nobody's all good) there.
Well, the judges might have gone one step further when they were told that the gelatin wasn't added because there was no time left and asked "Why wasn't it ready on time?" The truth would have had to come out, form someone, then. They sensed there was something fishy and should have pursued it further.
-
All they'd have to do is skip the idiotic repeats, that you see on every Bravo show. First they show you a scene "COMING UP NEXT". Then, after some interminable commercials, they show the same scene taking place in context. Then, after the next set of commercials, they repeat the scene for a THIRD time before moving…
I'm sort of hoping she'll be sued for that. Or arrested for hate crime incitement, or something like that.
I'm sort of hoping she'll be sued for that. Or arrested for hate crime incitement, or something like that.