Seriously. She’s disagreeing with them while upholding and defending their right to express their opinion.

Why? Or are you one of these people who can only be friends with people who hold the same political beliefs? How boring. And how insecure you must be in your beliefs that you can only tolerate the company of the like-minded.

I hear stuff like this and I wonder: really? Has he really “reignited” or advanced the discussion? Is there quantifiable proof? The advancement I’m seeing here is the race to see who can have the most original or creative National Anthem “protest.”

The Gunshow Poophole: When you try to stick your entire arm up your ass, but there’s no room because your head has taken up all of the available space.

Versus Obama supporting Al-Nusra? Hillary calling for a ground war via no fly zone? I mean they’re all bad on Syria, not the best domain for a ‘gotcha’ post

Phew - great.

Nothing says “own it” like hiding behind an anonymous account called “UrbanNunEnthusiast.”

Sure. Let’s hate on a truly historic sporting event because a third world country can’t come up with a pristine pitch. I mean, why even play the game, right? They’re lucky we even showed up on their dirty little island. They probably do their own laundry and shit like that.

“there is no “guilt” in the legal sense, there is only a ruling “in favor” of one party.”

At the risk of being a warrior for social justice, don’t the criticisms of the state of the pitch smell a little bit jingoistic? After all, this is a country that probably cares even less about soccer than we do.

Fuck off Billy

Just imagine how solid your moral high ground would be here if you HADN’T actually been publishing sleazy sex tapes and tabloid-esque hit pieces on closeted competitors with no journalistic merit whatsoever! Boy, that sure would be a lot more comfortable for all of us, wouldn’t it?

Here’s what I don’t get in all of this push-back against Thiel: How is it a “war on journalists” if Gawker was *found guilty* in a court of law??

Gawker continues to hide behind the “IF YOU CAN’T POST SEX TAPES AND OUT PEOPLE, THEN YOU WON’T BE ABLE TO DO *ANY* JOURNALISM!” defense.

My biggest question, though... when will you guys start publishing these sex tapes with 4 year-olds? I mean, if testimony is to be believed, it IS newsworthy.

Its not about being able to sue or not sue. Completely irrelevant.

I thought Univision deliberately did not take on liabilities associated with Gawker, yet somehow you guys keep writing about it.

http://tinyurl.com/h9fnz9w