I see what you're saying, but there is just as much potential for interference with 5Ghz as with 2.4. It all really depends on each individual person's living conditions e.g. the shape of the building, nearby appliances, distance from the router, neighbors with wireless networks.

PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD PARTY HARD…

That'd be pretty cool. It depends on when and how the remote session initiates. If it starts at (neo-XMB) then I would imagine you'd have access to the entire systems functions.

There really shouldn't be any difference of load times between console play and remote. All that's happening is the ps4 using the 'share' hardware as a tool to compress and send the video to your vita. The vita captures your keypresses and sends the information back. If anything, with proper optimization, it would…

Your statement is absurd. 5Ghz isn't necessarily a better connection than 2.4. It's entirely situational. Wireless b/g vs. n would be a valid concern. But I'm sure, with the new compression technologies, any routers/antennas made within the last ten years would probably be fine.

There have been huge strides in streaming gameplay technology. Also, the average broadband speed at the release of the feature for PS3/PSP was probably around 1M down.

Not to mention there's no official app for Google Play Music. That's one less competitor on the platform.

I'm sorry, I'm really not trying to be annoying but I'll have to disagree again. Failure would be not meeting their kickstarter goal, or failing to produce the product. Beyond that, failure is in the eye of the beholder. It's not a gaming revolution like they said, but I'm sure even Julie Uhrman knew that wasn't…

Companies falsely advertise all the time. What it boils down to is: yes, I play actual OUYA games on it. Last week, me and 5 friends (6 players total), played a trivia game on the OUYA at the same time. There's an android app that corresponds so up to 11 people can play it. It was great! There's also Pier Solar being…

http://trib.al/tRAJGmu

I suppose that's one way to look at it. But that's like saying that Ubuntu is Mint since they're both based on Debian. Yes, but so very much no also.

This whole time I thought it was so that I would drop it and have to buy another when all the water spills out. Who knew!

I was just going to post the same thing. I always read his articles though, and today is just ugly. Maybe he bought Madden for the free NFL watching and is furious about how it's not working.

It's pretty similar to Win8. And they're trying to achieve cross platform unity. Slap a frilly design behind those live tiles and Whammo! ...Microsoft.

Then hate the hype, not the machine. Yes, it was called the god-machine. No, it wasn't the god-machine. Everyone knew it. I funded it because I wanted what it is, not what they called it. There's nothing wrong with the OUYA.

I know, right? I bought one, and I like it just fine. I don't see why everyone feels the need to shit on it. I knew I was getting a low-power $100 emu-box with the potential to house some fun little indie titles. I know Julie's pitching her whole low-cost-gaming-revolution thing. I just wanted a cool little piece of…

There's still time! We're looking at you, scientists.

Well how much does it really matter? Everyone's already bought the game. And even if they haven't, crashing from server load wouldn't deter most people from purchasing it later on. It's a dick move, but they probably played it safe financially and it makes sense.

Oh wow, I had never seen a netbook with unlocked frequencies. I've always steered clear of software overclocks as it is though. It just sounds so much more unstable. I do have a netbook now that I got for free, but it's running linux off the SD card(since the stupid 1.8" hdd failed) so that kinda puts me out on even…

It's not the amount of .gifs that make a good post. But rather, how the .gifs are used.