I think you're confused. Brad never said anything like that. lol Maybe you missed the last 3 interviews where Brad said his marriage was him pretending it was something that it wasn't (she was just rebound from Paltrow, and he was never in love w/ Aniston...? Just a guess), and that he was bored and miserable…
rosiedublin
belllaculllen
Not really. The whole vicious bitter betty snark at Pitt and Jolie, out of resentment/jealousy (and referring to their adopted kids as armies, or store bought, or whatever) is pretty played out. It's been 9 years. That's a long time, even for a joke that was once funny back in the day - which that one never was.
That's what most people think, which is why along with being a no-talent slag, a lot of people believe she's a coattailing phoney hypocrite using her personal life to stay relevant instead of artistic merit. Your post perfectly describes her famewhore behavior. No one cares if she has unfortunate looking children…
Oh good! Hair salons, and salacious gossip from sites like THIS ONE (Helloooo?) go well together. This is a celebrity gossip tabloid trash site you know....are you in the right place? You aren't surprised are you? You didn't make a wrong turn and mean to wind up in the Columbia Journalism Review forums did you?
I see Ms. Bitter Betty...and by "purchase," I guess you mean what the rest of the world may refer to as 'adoption.' Or is it only 'purchasing,' when beautiful Oscar winning movie stars whose eyes you want to scratch out, do it. Hmmm. I'm sure Angelina, Charlize, Katherin Heigl and Sandra Bullock are terribly hurt…
By that you mean to say that she might not want kids, yet she's deceptively giving interviews in which she says she does?? That would make her a big fake hypocrite then? Not that I'd be surprised.
She does that all the time, where've you been? Although it's less about her 'fucking with people,' (this is the same woman who cries and moans about the tabloids, complaining and saying her personal life is no one's business - so why would she invite that? ). I'd say that it's more about her needing the photo-op to…
Nope, not even then..this is just this past week:
You got it half right. It's the tabloids thinking they know the demo of Aniston supporters/enablers. They think the only interest in Aniston, comes from tabloid ninnies who are envious of and hate, Brangelina. In that, they are basically correct. Face facts.
The constant pregnancy speculation re Aniston, is part and parcel of the Aniston revenge fantasy on perfect loved up beautiful family la Brangelina that 'Team Aniston,' prays for. It's also fed by Aniston's own PR people.
+100 Thank you.
I responded to this sentence of yours....:
Are you slow? You honestly got THAT, from what I said? Read it again. I said I can always tell her fans because they bring up a movie most people have never seen. That's not conjecture, it's a fact. So many of the Aniston coddlers bring it up, that IF every one of them had truly seen the movie, it would have been…
No, that's her face. Why are people so blind when it comes to her? I feel I live in an alternate universe when it comes to Aniston. Like if someone started proclaiming Kathy Griffin, Miranda Kerr's twin.
Since Friends ended, she's had her jaw realigned, and shaved down, restylane around her mouth, botox, her 4th nose job, and laser work. She has a totally different face. Those that don't admit it or address it, are, as usual, her enablers and coddlers. It's a fascinating phenom.
That sucked too, mainly because she was supposed to be playing a femme fatale tempting Clive Owens away from Melissa George. Right.
The balls caught in the zipper thing, ala There's Something About Mary, got a laugh. But then stupid dick jokes get laughs 100% of the time. It's a dick, it's being injured - haha.
You know how I can tell a so called objective observer is really an Aniston fanbot in disguise? When they invariably bring up 'Good Girl,' a movie that no one cares about, that didn't release wide and that no one saw except people that like Jennifer Aniston and want to claim she's a good actress and is not horrible, …
Yes, because some 40-something heretofor no-name poseur douche who's been a struggling wannabe his entire adult life, and who needs to hook up with a lame mediocre tv shitcom hacktress tabloid staple like Aniston to create his own career, is capable of giving great advice to others....