I like the kid friendly section idea best.flight attendants have to do a lot of shit during the course of their day, and, in my opinion, probably wouldn't see the signs of a child being abused on an airplane given the shirt amount of time they actually spend in front of and talking to passengers. Also, based on my…

Holy shit. I must have detached myself too, because YOUR reality seems so much nicer than the one I live in! I'll go ahead and guess that you've never been so broke you've needed to do something alternative just to get by. I'll also guess you're parents were fortunate enough to be able to provide. I'll also bet that…

I agree, maybe a nom de plume would have been a better choice, but a have a HUGE issue with your argument. I don't think maturity has anything to do with this story being shared. And the article also touches on how society feels about sex work in general, which is a problem.

How could it not be a positive influence? She could possibly just emphasize acceptance of everyone, not being hateful.

But the point of the article is that she was employed and forced out of her teaching job AFTER she was already working there and the exposé was written. She probably didn't out it on her resumé when she applied for her teaching position.

While it's clear you've made up your mind to be an awful judgemental human being, I will say this:

Chris Brown ASSAULTED another person. Not the same thing.

You know, I can bet she didn't give her consent to the Post to write about her. Who gives a fuck what job she had before teaching? She chose a way to make money to support herself, whose business is it but her own? She chose to share her story, which someone took advantage of. Whoever wrote that exposé should be…

No. Chris Brown assaulted another person against their will. This woman did nothing to someone else against there will, she just chose an alternative career.

That's part of the problem though. One big part of the Christian faith is asserting on others and trying to make everyone believe the same thing.

Yeah I didn't appreciate that response either. In your first comment I really liked your last sentence. I found it accurate and relevant. Like, why would Rush Limbaugh care so much about feminists?

You know what, Lindy? I liked this. I'm not a huge fan of people shitting on you for your writing style. I find a lot of sarcasm in your pieces and I like that. I know a lot of people don't get it, but that's ok, we're all different, and that's ok too. Do I think this is the best way to convince the masses to change…

This. All of this. I love it.

Didnt Jezebel do an article on the rise of men using self-degradation?

She never said a man made that comment.

Anyone who remains married to a guy running a reparative therapy clinic should probably not be in Congress. Just a thought.

I think that's his point. What better movie screening to perform such a haneous act? There were many people waiting for this movie to come out and plenty of ads for it so I'm sure this man new what the villain looked like. It's just speculation but maybe he thought it would be easier to do this at the Dark Knight…