Crying laughing at "carnitas." Of course that's your favorite food, Harry!

This offends me as a heterosexual man, as a married person, and as a feminists, but mostly this offends me as an Economists (day job). Cloaking century-old notions about gender in economics is complete horseshit, especially when there is actually zero data used. There is lots of great economic research being done on…

Living deep in the bible-belt and being a 30-something, vagina-having, marriage-free, childless, world traveling, home owning, sex liking woman with no plans to change any of those things, I get the "why buy the cow" comment quite often.

Blame it on testosterone, call it whatever you want—but on average, men initiate sex more than women, they're more sexually permissive than women, and they connect sex to romance less often than women.

I'm really tired of crap like this painting men as helpless creatures being led around by our dicks.

"Sex is her resource. Sex in consensual relationships will happen when women want it to. So how do women decide to begin a sexual relationship? Pricing. Women have something of value that men want...badly, something men are actually willing to sacrifice for. So how much does sex cost for men? It might cost him nothing…

Just had a peek at the Austin Institute's website (a.k.a. the people behind this vid), and it's six men and two women. All white, and all with some religious affiliation, mostly Mormon. Heh.

Wouldn't want to let women have agency and financial independence—then you'd have to rely on who you are as a human being to attract a partner, instead of just buying one.

No. It goes back to the slave days when black men were lynched for so much as looking at a white woman but black women were used as concubines by their white owners all the time.

I bet if you were IN an interracial relationship you would have a rude awakening. Speaking from experience.

"As Perkins points out, according to the 2009 census, there were significantly more white women with black men than black women with white men, so chocking these racist reactions up to lack of exposure doesn't make sense. "

"Additionally, interracial children are confusing. They can't be put in a box. Who are they? What should we call someone who is interracial? (A person.)"

I don't know why this data should be surprising. Black men were lynched for even looking at a white woman in the past. It has everything to do with ownership. White men believed themselves to be better than all other races and as such, entitled to the use of all others. This included white women. Only they are allowed…

What strikes me as odd is how boilerplate the essay is. It literally could have been written by any socially conservative, middle-aged woman at any time over the past forty years. There is nothing remotely new here. That she felt a need to speak up in the WSJ about this issue and that WSJ editors thought that would…

Well, it makes sense when you realize sex and your vagina are only there for men. And men are only there for marriage. I mean, there's no way you're be fucking your dude because you enjoy it or it feels good. There's no way to be with a man besides being married or having shameful "free" sex that isn't contingent on a…

I know why you're single. You haven't met someone you connect with at a time in your life when you have been both open to it and happy with yourself. It's just like everything else in life, timing, opportunity and ability.