bcfred2
bfred
bcfred2

Contemporary takes were that he went from being a stoic reassuring presence to an “Irish hippie” which was a direction Cuarón gave that somehow stuck. They were woefully proven wrong when Gambon showed that he could believably play the most powerful wizard of all time while still showing layers of care laid between

Absolutely; I love every shot that has Duvall on a horse, and am glad I saw it in a theater. Feel like it and Thirteen Days get overlooked when we (often deservedly) poke fun at Costner these days.

Thinking the Speaker would target one of his own members through social media rather than just finding ways to screw his district over through funding in the spending bill shows why Gaetz has probably peaked in his political trajectory.

Open Range is my favorite western in the last 20 years, in large part because of Mr. Gambon’s fantastic performance.

My investment from 2008 would be closer to $35K today in just dollar inflation. The specialist who did the work might be charging more for labor and who knows what the true market is for original parts! (Which in my case was a couple carriage bolts and some suspension, otherwise I have a numbers matching example.)

I’m very surprised that Diego Luna getting a hugely acclaimed Star Wars role hasn’t led to any kind of major rediscovery of Open Range.

So...Matt Gaetz pays influencers to attack people online.

He was too cranky, I guess? His performance definitely doesn't match up with the zany and twee Dumbledore from the earlier books, but later-books Dumbledore is revealed to be kind of a dick, so I was okay with it.

Yep, I agree with that one. 

I think in Prisoner of Azkaban it was just that he was different than Harris and played the role different.

The thing is, Trump’s political speeches have always been a rambling, incoherent mess, so it’s almost impossible to notice any sort of cognitive decline. 

“you can drive for 15 minutes before you have to get a charge.”

But in your case it’s fact

NP on this one, I’ve had the good fortune to be able to drive a series 2 a couple of times and it was glorious. We had a 1969 for sale for awhile and since I did my homework on the specifics of that car I ended up getting all the leads and test drives. It had been upgraded to three carbs (originally went to two

“We pass the savings--and the costs--on to you!”

I personally think they looks stunning in person. But as always, looks are subjective.

GO SAWX! YANKEES SUCK!

Author of the book got burned on it looks good, hence the body shell repair etc. Up close and in person PPI by a knowledgeable E-Type expert is mandatory. Still a NP, you can get 20-30K for a complete basket case

Honestly, if the body and frame are in good condition, I’d go with a nice price on this example. $60k is a lot, and there will likely be tens of thousands more to do in the next years, but if you have the money and want a mild project, you could go a lot worse than this lovely E Type.

IF the work it needs is nothing egregious, then NP, I suppose. But the mechanic’s offer in the ad is notable, and not in a good way.