I was lucky enough to be there when they shot the video. You can literally hear this car from miles away.

I visited the Pagani factory last year and was standing about 3-4 feet behind the test car (at that time with the Cinque engine) while the test driver revved the hell out of it.

You are saying that current policy does not make sense, and you can think of a better way to do things. Correct?

It would indeed, it's one of the emergency plans

What's survival instinct then?

Yep. At that range 5.56 is going to behave like a .22LR. Better hope those are select fire rifles because 2-3 shots is just going to make a motivated person very angry.

You obviously have not interacted with even a low level PR org. Let me fix this for you (this isn't my job title btw). "USAF F16 rams airliner carrying bomb"

As an American, I routinely want to bomb Canada. Like everyday. But then again, as an American, I want to bomb everyone. Like everyday.

Indeed, they would take down the plane if the cockpit was compromised, ATC had lost communication with the pilots, and the plane was on a course towards a metropolitan area. The F-16s were not carrying any ordnance...however, neither were the F-15 and F-16s that were scrambled during the initial hijackings on 9/11. …

Their LT needs to rethink his team's orders. Clarity is paramount to communicating in an emergency. Heads Down, Hands Up is way too easy to confuse. Not just from the words, but by constantly repeating it like they were you can hear "Down Hands, Up Heads" which is the exact opposite of what they need.

So I guess choking this clown out and leaving him hogtied in the back until the plane reached its destination was out of the question?

You're tripping over your hindsight. Obviously, the pilot could've waited until he'd blown the plane up to ask for the commandos to storm the plane, but of course if that was the SOP by then the passengers would have been scattered all over the Midwest. And I'd really rather pilots concentrate on flying the plane,…

We shouldn't have to. It's a truly fucked way to treat your site's visitors.

A check? What is this, 1994? Who in the world doesn't have direct deposit? Are you a migrant worker or something?

He could have taken that shit down to the bank and gotten it consolidated. What he did is a shitbrick move and he deserves to be called on it.

She as a priviate citizen is not legaly required to accept pennies as payment.

Why not douse the pennies in syrup and coat them with flour? IT'S LEGAL TENDERP!

Can we NOT have autoplaying videos?

I don't take issue so much with they paying her in coins, as much as I do the fact that I'm almost positive that if someone tried to buy a car FROM them in pennies, they'd probably refuse it.

OK, "I didn't actually write what I wanted in the contract that I signed" isn't a "loophole" that the customer is exploiting.. It means that you have to honor the contract you actually signed, not the one you wish you had signed.