Yeah, I think the bride/groom made an informed decision, but I feel bad for the innocent bystanders. Can you imagine, you’re already dreading going to your shitty conservative cousin’s wedding because when her Facebook isn’t MAGA it’s a fucking wedding countdown clock, and all you’re looking forward to is the open…

Right! Like, it’s like he wanted to set everything right before he croaked. I’m not even impressed but I’m disturbed by the internalizing of the older black man involved. Perhaps it’s a sign that, despite going through the hellish world that American racism, he has managed to keep his humanity intact. I really don’t…

Words don’t mean shit.

Kelly will tighten up the office and the staff, but he can’t ever manage Trump for long. The more success Kelly has, the more the media will talk about his success, the more he will be seen as controlling Trump. That perception will nag at Trump until he literally can’t help but act out. Every single time.

Do you think it can last though? Every few weeks we’re promised that a new, more professional administration is just around the corner and then something happens that rattles Mr Orange’s cage and we’re back to square one.

Ugh. It’s my worst nightmare. Kelly is going to impose discipline on this bunch of clowns, and the craven incompetence will not be so glaringly obvious.

Those aren’t Trump tweets. Kelly obviously has someone showing up at 5:30 am now. I’m betting Hope Hicks looks real tired this week.

trump was so desperate - is so desperate - to be a sports team owner. It’s an exclusive club of rich (mostly white) guys (with a few gals): membership in that is almost as exclusive as being a US Senator or an ex-President.

Or a CEO.

So this dude was doing this at 14/15? That’s a psychopath right there.

Wait ... Venezuela has been sliding toward totalitarian hellhole status for well over a decade, and Corbyn has been known to speak in favor of its administration? That’s not a good sign.

The jury charge says they estimated her lost profits at $357,000 over the last two years, and that she reasonably lost $150,000 in future business over the next year. The rest is a combination of various “mental anguish” and defamation punitive charges awarded by the jury.

There’s almost no way she pulled $500K a year.

Well, punitive damages are generally available in defamation cases against private individuals if the defamer acted with malice. Given that the defendants here put down in writing their intent to ruin the plaintiff’s business, establishing malice is a slam dunk. So who knows exactly how it was apportioned, but I’d…

I’m a real estate agent here and SAME. I add a rider to every lease where I mostly just reiterate a few key portions of the lease in very simple language with the hope that the people who skip over the legalese will read ten sentences in the rider.

Well, we don’t know how successful her photography business was. She lost two years of business-not to mention the impact this will have on future business. So, if she was a high-earning photographer $1 million could be a calculation of her lost earnings plus her legal expenses.

Yeah, I read the Washington Post story, and it could be a lot shorter if it just said “a lot of people didn’t read the original contractand decided to go to war over $125, but upon reading everyone went ‘uh-oh, our bad, nvm’”.

They literally destroyed her successful business; it’s not completely unbelievable that a previously in demand wedding photog could have pulled in that amount in the couple of years since the wedding, not to mention emotional damages.

Lawyer here. God yes! Fucking read the contract!!

Fuck these people.