You can't even admit that I simply exaggerated, showing your lack of integrity. And your citation of effeminate is exactly what I'm talking about. You consider attraction to men an effeminate trait. When in obvious actuality, attraction to men is just attraction to men. It's you who considers them more suited to…

Get over yourself, because you haven't destroyed anything, except yourself, so keep telling yourself that. Eventually you may even believe it yourself. Again, still an exaggeration. In all practicality, the misquotation was not far from your argument. And I'll just say how novel it is to see somebody who justifies…

Nope, it was an exaggeration. I lack integrity? Awfully powerful words coming from a one-trick pony. Especially because you still are unable to argue something other than homophobia. And you also haven't 'destroyed' anything. You keep throwing that around. It's sort of like if Obama said, "I solved all the problems."…

Not understanding where you're coming from? Naturally. An open-minded person and someone who lives under a rock can't possibly agree. While I follow logic, you follow ignorance. You clearly don't know what natural is, because clinical does not mean unnatural.

Babies don't come from old people or kids either. Are they unnatural? How about infertile people? Babies can come from homosexual couples, and often times they do. However, infertile couples don't, man-woman or same-sex. Would you say that those other groups are unnatural too? It's also pretty funny that you'd doubt…

Call it what you want, in practicality, it's discrimination. That is completely synonymous with not casting black people because "it would be hard for them to maintain the correct symbol." It's publicly perceived as racist to grade with bias towards white people (and it is, so don't try to victimize white people), and…

Oh ho ho getting testy are we? How am I searching for something coherent? I'm not even attacking you and I easily counter everything you write tenfold. I'm not playing any victim card. I'm sick and tired of LGBT discrimination, and I just want it to stop. That's what I bring attention to it. You, on the other hand,…

What? That's not even the same usage. Does the English language just fly over your head?

No, not really. I believe that people should be able to live the way that's most natural to them. And because homosexuality is a natural condition, as natural as heterosexuality, then so be it. If two people love each other, then why not? If you equate homosexuals to goats and sheep, then heterosexuals are exactly the…

Ahhh, I feel satisfied with my superior argument. When defining homophobic actions as anything but and complaining about 'liberals' in the vaguest way possible, you've pretty much proven I've won. So thanks for that.

And to prove you wrong yet again, here is this: http://www.queerty.com/new-study-reve…. And because you don't like evidence or people disagreeing with you, I know you won't go there. So here's an excerpt:

Nothing in your argument has anything to do with facts. Hollywood doesn't push any gay activism. They, surprise, make movies. Nothing else. Chick-a-filet, Firefox are both examples of extreme homophobia. REAL homophobia, things that can't be denied. Honestly, when you're reasoning that those two examples are part of…

Oh look, somebody says something isn't right! Let's follow their beliefs even though they're not considerate of people and this person is completely insignificant in every regard!

Lol, your ignorance and blatant thickness is quite amusing.

And in this article we have restriction to a game that possesses equality and equal representation. It's one thing for a company to miss a demographic, as the Japanese are rather unfamiliar with LGBT oppression, and to actually oppress LGBT individuals.

Here's what your argument really is: "I'm not oppressed, I can't comprehend oppression, I'm tired of people wanting equal rights, I'll just ignore it, my opinion is better than everybody's else and rules over facts, etc. etc." I don't want anybody to fucking cry for me. If anything, I'd rather you just shut up. Yes,…

Get rid of all relationships and force all characters to experience unrequited love.

That's not at all what I said. Oh my god poor straight man! I'm sure you're just hoping and wishing to have as many rights as LGBT individuals, right? Please, quit it with the discrimination here. You will never be actually oppressed for being straight, as will white people never miss opportunities for being white.…

Dark Souls 2, maybe.

Except you couldn't have any MORE rights as a straight man, so as actual discrimination, it's pretty ineffective. But that's only if you ignore the fact that as a straight man you're not entitled to making your own judgements. of others.