I grew up in the 8os and 90s and heard it plenty. But I also grew up in a pretty racist area.

Can someone please tell me what NACHO means in the context of Offerman tweeting about Trump? He uses it a lot and I can’t keep up with new acronyms and google has failed me.

Donald may be sexist, but he isn’t anything as mild as a sentient carrot. He may, however, be the end result of cross-breeding carrots with with tobacco using nuclear waste, much like tomacco. It would certainly explain the hair.

“We women are so conditioned to relate everything to men. Put a group of women together and the conversation will eventually be about men.”

I assume you meant George Wallace? George McGovern was more or less the Bernie of his era.

I am not a crier. I usually cry maybe 4-5 times a year at most. And this made me fucking CRY. I don’t know how I missed it before, but thank you so much for sharing it now.

She is definitely wearing makeup in that pic too. Less, but definitely not none.

...and that still isn’t a no-makeup look. Like, at all.

Kim kardashian was definitely not wearing “no makeup.” Just less makeup. Which, given how much makeup she usually wears, is probably still quite a bit.

Yes, exactly! I also supported Bernie in the primaries, but refusing to vote for HRC now is just plain immature and ego-driven. I’ve heard folks act like this is just another election, that they’re always being told to wait for “next time,” and “when will it ever be the right time?” Uh, maybe when an established…

It would probably make them actively hostile. The Breitbart headline would be something like: “granny-hating Obama wants to youth-enize our seniors!”

Exactly! I work for an agency that provides services to homeless folks, and we run three soup kitchens and three food pantries. One of the ONLY good things Bush Jr. Did was openly support and sign a piece of legislation making it easier for grocery stores to donate food to soup kitchens. While his motives may not have…

Is it just me, or is feminism starting to get super humorless again? This shit is like purity politics on steroids.

If being critical of a person because of their shitty behavior, and using silly descriptive language to do so, is “trying to build one person up at the expense of another person,” then I assume you are similarly outraged at every Jez article about Donald Trump being horrible to someone. Even more outraged, actually,…

The buttered noodle description really wasn’t gendered at all, though, and male celebrities get the same treatment at Jez all the damn time. Seems like a whole lot of outrage over nothing.

I am definitely going to pull out “you don’t get to leave comments with your vote” the next time I’m arguing with some smug “progressive” asshole who doesn’t understand how politics OR actual revolutions even work.

I think I like your less-temperate version better than mine, though.

Nah. Crocs are way too comfortable.

Someone much younger, most likely.

“You people saying “ Jen won” over Jolie are exactly misogynst for the same reasons you describe.” Sure, if anyone was actually saying that. The only one I see framing this as a competition here is you.