Storywise, yes I agree. Gameplay wise? Please no more Ixalan, it was a bad format.  

That assumes the person who is considering the game relies solely on the cost per hour metric and doesn’t look at any other information about the game at all.

Not really. I didn’t even need a tourist visa to get in. Just had to fill in a little customs and immigration form and let them take my picture.

I would assume that a civilization that is capable of building a simulation of our universe is almost by necessity a post singularity civilization. Its literally impossible for us to grasp the technological advances such a civilization may have made.

I never said I believe its okay for people to kill because they believe in a different God. I said that whether you believe its right or its wrong to kill people for a specific reason, be it God or because they are soldiers fighting for a dictator, that is an opinion. I said you cannot objectively prove that one…

If that was true, then the people doing the killing would know that what they are doing is evil and that they are going to hell for it. The simple fact that these people still think of themselves as the good guys shows that morality is in the eye of the beholder.

Yes, plenty of philosophers have tried to find objective morality and none of them succeeded. It doesn’t exist. We live in an indifferent universe so any morality we come up with is man made and subjective.

Objectively no, there isn’t. If religion isn’t your thing, you couldn’t care less if God is sad. If religion is your thing, God may stand above anything and anyone. There is no objective way to prove who is justified here.

Yeah thats nice in a museum. Not a diplomatic dinner party. Diplomatic dinner parties shouldn’t make you uncomfortable and question yourself because thats how conflicts get started (unless of course the intent is to start a conflict).

Yes, you think. Its your opinion. And opinions are subjective. Especially this one since there have been plenty of people who are of the opinion that waging a holy war is totally justified. Objectively their opinion is worth just as much as yours.

Religious people see being LGBTQ+ as something amoral (and depending on the country, illegal). Be you a conservative or liberal, you’ll probably always find your own behavior justified. But the fact is that both sides employ the same logic and also the same methods to try and force their will on other people.

Obviously I’m not saying that shaming someone or using deadly force is the same thing. I am saying that violence is a spectrum and that both deadly force and shaming someone is part of that spectrum, although both occupy different parts of the spectrum. I’m also saying that the deeper underlying logic of using…

Or perhaps you shouldn’t use college aged people in your military. It would probably improve the overall quality of the American military if being soldier turns into a professional long term career choice rather than this thing you do when you’re done with high school.

I was more responding to this bit:

Liberals fight in wars just as well as conservatives do. Sometimes those wars are justified on clearly liberal principles. Except in those cases Liberals are fine with it because its for a cause they agree with and they see themselves as justified.

Basically what you’re saying is that you think Donald Glover is a race traitor because he is attracted to people with a different skin color. Except you package it a bit more carefully to sound nicer. But the underlying logic is exactly the same.

What? Having quality voice acting has nothing to do with whether people play the game or not. Those things are unrelated. Voice acting can considerably improve a game, but it can’t turn a meh game into a good one and its not what makes people play and keeps them playing. Case in point DA inquisition and ME Andromeda.…

No one plays Far Cry just for the voice acting performance of two antagonists who maybe only have 30 minutes worth of dialogue in a 40 hour game. The gameplay itself is also solid in the way it offers players freedom to approach a lot of the objectives in their own way. I suppose it also helps that a lot of the…

South Park’s philosophy isn’t that people who advocate change are terrible people. Far from it in fact as the shows voices of reason often advocate social change. Its core message is and always was that no cause is so important that you can’t make fun of it and that people who adopt a cause still need to be able to…

Its a shame that a game that has you play as an inquisitor leading an inquisition, you don’t get to do a lot of stuff the inquisition is known for. The inquisition is not a force of good that saves the world through acts of kindness and open minded understanding, the inquisition is a tool of brutal repression to…