barebranch
barebranch
barebranch

I'm legit confused. Was this really written by the aforementioned George Atallah? That's awesome if so, but I feel like this article needs a "No, really, this was legit written by George Atallah, the Assistant (to) the Executive Director of External Affairs for the NFLPA"

Implicit in your query of "So she SHOULD have..." (emphasis mine obviously) is the seemingly equal assignment of responsibility to her. I'm not arguing for an abrogation of personal responsibility for one's actions, but your question seems to accept at face value that the expected consequences, at least for women, of

If putting the responsibility for rapes on people who actually commit rape makes me a "progressive", just call me Teddy Roosevelt.

Good job calling me out on my heteronormative statements — that's useful in the context of a story about male/female sexual assault. And I'm not saying he's guilty - I'm saying his actions and the evidence presented so far are consistent with someone who is guilty. Maybe there's a perfectly reasonable explanation

Your statement, while technically true, is also borderline psycopathic. He may still be "legally" innocent but based on this story, would you let your sister/daughter/other close female relative or friend go out with this guy? He's innocent, right?

Are you saying that because she did so it's ok that she get raped? Cause that's kind of what it sounds like.

at $200 a plate, expressing a strong preference that the entree be free of conspicuous dirt doesn't strike me as being entitled

so you're basically saying the Greek system should shut up and take it? After all they've pretty much been asking for it in your opinion.

Can somebody point me to the origin story of Drew's beef with Greggg? I find it hilarious but am curious if there's a specific incident. Possibly it would be even funnier if it were completely arbitrary. Has Greggg ever acknowledged the weekly slagging off he suffers at Drew's hands?

Thanks for this. Absolute perfection.

In the best possible way.

I've seen several references to this ...where is it at?

Dad here. Drives me crazy when there are no changing tables at ostensibly family friendly (or even family tolerant) establishments. Sounds like she chose the least bad option for her situation. As long as there were no other patrons affected, seems like the manager/owner could have discreetly asked her to not do

I'm guessing that he's got a lot of "paper" money in that net worth calculation...maybe valuing future royalties or somesuch at an inflated rate. Generally, people who can truly afford it don't stiff vendors to this degree...60-90 days is one thing. Not responding to yearslong correspondence and forcing a vendor who

But I'd be willing to bet that in this case it actually does.

They took our JERRRRBS!!

Am I the only one who initially read the headline as "Police: Donte Greene Apologized After Getting Tasted In The Butt"?

Look at all the fucks she does not give.