SpaceX rockes alread are far more advanced, cheaper than Russian Soviet junk. You apparently cant read because I said - we are just two years away from US having its own cheaper and much more capable bus system to ISS. And guess what? The cost revolution brought on by SpaceX will damage Russian space program.

Woah, they managed to build a new space port which is going to host a very inefficient,underperforming and expensive rocket (Angara). Woah, I`m taken aback!

HAHAHAHAHA!

As of 2015. We are two years away from that situation being fixed.

It hasnt been outsourced. While Russia has been building way too expensive and way too underperforming Angara, US is in a transitional period between Shuttles and SpaceX built rockets, modules and Boeings module. And oh, SLS - which will take US beyond Moon and to Mars while Russia will be fiddling in LEO.

Do they have any concept art? Because last time they ripped off Star Trek’s drydock for their next generation space station that isn’t actually happening ( shit you not, they actually lifted copyrighted Paramount CG). Are they going to rip off 2001: A Space Odyssey this time?

Let me know when Russia gains the ability…

There is a difference between having an engine and a module and being capable of building a new space station.

Bullshit. They dont have the money or the technology for it. Most of their projects are hype and that`s it.

And once ISS is de-orbited (as it should be as soon as possible) and gone, US will be the sole space champion.

US allies are loving this.

Read this and I agree with it so there you have it.

‘’Putin is coming to the UN General Assembly in September, itself a big deal given that his last attendance was in 2005. With the prospects of an acceptable deal over the conflict in Donbas receding, with the Russian economy expected to continue to decline, he’s looking for his own “reset” and sees it in some…

5-7 years from today - no.

She sure has that BBW chubbyness.

Pretending being a superpower.

You underestimate the political issue here - F-35 had to happen because of partnering countries. And some people in Washington thought F-22 isnt needed. If there was a differnet kind of thinking, we`d have +500 F-22s flying around.

MAKS is good for show-off, for anything business related 2015 has been rather weak :

Pretty sure Uprising is before TFA.

Thank you, this means a lot for us in the Baltics - doesnt matter if they are going to be deployed here.

I mean, dont get me wrong - US is very a technologically advanced country but to assume that just because it looks kinda simple and old, it doesnt mean its not American.