Mostly agree except for it being her fault for being in Russia. She, like other Americans, was in Russia for business. Right up until the invasion people were hoping Russia would change its’ mind.

Mostly agree except for it being her fault for being in Russia. She, like other Americans, was in Russia for business. Right up until the invasion people were hoping Russia would change its’ mind.

By jove, that changes everything. Quick Mr Biden, you must abandon Ukraine and rescue the person stupid enough to go to Russia in the run-up to their invasion of Ukraine we all knew was coming... somehow...

These articles need to stop. Each one is worse than the last. They remain counterfactual and completely ignore the way these things work. Each subsequent article fails to examine how the process actually works.

Just an FYI, Hulu usually does a Black Friday sale where you can get a yearlong subscription for $24. So if you wait a few months, you might be able to pick it up for cheap. 

I haven’t watched this show yet but only because I absolutely refuse to get another streaming service. That said, anything with Steve Martin (except those stupid Pink Panther remakes!!!) is worth a watch and I like the rest of the cast.

Quite honestly that letter could quickly become the least of her worries. Depending on her employers’ tolerance for social media usage by employees she could with worrying ease get sacked as a result of this.

According to the SCOTUS, only ‘True Threats’ are an exception to the First Amendment, not threats made in jest, not threats made that have no real intent to be carried out, only direct threats. Even in the Watts v US where Watts said, “If they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is…

I guess we’re throwing out the 1st amendment as well.

Don’t trust McConnell.

Don’t trust McConnell.

Don’t trust McConnell.

Don’t trust McConnell.

I’m just waiting for the inevitable break up and the great song she writes about it 

It’s 2022 bro, they're gonna replace Miller with Chris Pratt.

Don’t thank people for giving out misinformation. District court judges are not subject to a filibuster, and can be confirmed by a simple majority. That rule was changed by Democrats in 2013, even before the filibuster was eliminated for Supreme Court justices. 

Nope, OP is wrong about basic facts. District court judges are not subject to a filibuster and can be confirmed by a simple majority, it’s been that way since Democrats changed the rule in 2013. 

It’s misinformation and wrong. District court judges are not subject to a filibuster and can be confirmed by a simple majority, a rule Democrats changed way back in 2013. 

Maybe I’m missing some nuance, but didn’t eliminating the judicial filibuster in 2013 (i.e. the Nuclear Option) mean exactly that he can’t be filibustered?