bananastree
BananasTree
bananastree

You're now going to ignore me after I post proof that Israel is in Stage 8 of committing genocide? Genocide Watch is an incredible organization committed to preventing genocide- are they antisemitic as well? 

Genocide Watch considers it genocide, and yes they put Palestine under the same warning:

Calling critics of the Israeli government is really dangerous, especially when that criticism is over the bombing of Palestinian’s. You’re measuring degrees of genocide, and gaslighting Palestinians by (essentially) saying that it could be worse...because the Palestinians can fight back? The Foreign Minister of Iran

It’s not antisemitic when that famous Israeli can’t mention Palestinian victims of the Israeli government, or the nation of Palestine which is currently being bombed to dust by the Israeli government.

Is that really the only other thing you think Gadot could have said? That kind of extremist thinking is why the Israeli government gets away with their shit on a global level. The minute anyone calls the government out on their shitty and asinine behavior, responses get taken to the 11th level - for no goddamn reason

Notice how Chrissy Teigan, a goddamn adult and a horrible person based on these tweets and DM’s, is completely ignored, while Stodden is the one being picked apart.

But how much blame can you lay at the feet of a person who cannot legally consent to getting their ears pierced or to smoke cigarettes because they are not fully functioning beings?

Clinton is a sexual predator, who began assaulting women in college (Juanita Broderick) and continued through the 90's. Paula Jones was a rape victim of Clinton, who was told by everyone in the media (fuck everyone at SNL during this time period) that she was “too ugly to rape”. I don’t believe for a second that she

I think when everyone involved is very influential, and Phylicia Rashad’s Dr. Claire Huxtable IS as influential as Bill Cosby’s character, is hard to accept when they make such a grave error. Especially when so many of us have been the victims of assault, it's incredibly difficult to accept that a person we admire

I first realized this after Sandy Hook, when my Grandparents did the whole “It’s such a shame, those poor kids, but *THEY* better not try gun control.” They’re White, conservative and old, and they don’t own a gun. It’s solely the idea that those kids’ lives were less valuable than the gun rights of the dick bag who

Oh not at all...we NEED to have these discussions, online and in real life. It helps me as I usually gain a new perspective, which has never been a bad thing. I appreciate you for being kind and having a rational discussion!

I can shake hands on this and move on. I think we both agree that her treatment of his victims was not fair. 

1) The Jez article went beyond the parents, and discussed people who blindly defended Josh. Those people were referred to as enablers.

This is now becoming a discussion of at what point does someone become an enabler, because I and others seem to view it as any defense of an abuser enables the abuse. It enables others to abuse as well. Lisa Bonet says that Cosby’s treatment of her was a warning sign. Rashad disagrees, and tried to gaslight Bonet’s

See also: An entire documentary on R. Kelly's abuse, and the men and women who enabled him by defending him against his victims, and the industry that covered it up. 

I didn't imply that women will keep men from being rapists, or that women are responsible for the rape that occur by men. I said that if the blame the victim or outright slander victims then they are enablers. Jezebel wrote an entire article about the men and *women* that enabled Josh Duggar to molest and abuse

Josh Duggar- Jezebel wrote an entire article about all of the people that enabled him. Why is this any different? 

1) Phylicia Rashad called Cosby’s victims “shameless” for coming forward.

One wouldn’t exist without the other, and when women verbally abuse victims by calling them names (“shameless”, for example) they become cogs in the machine for cover ups. We're beyond the passive woman, just trying to make it in a man's world- when you defend the abuser and abuse the victims, you're an enabler. 

It seems to me that if they’re going to *CHOOSE* to be the gatekeeper by publicly defending the rapist, and shaming his victims during interviews, then those women should be considered enablers. It wasn’t a one-time defense either- she slammed his victims at least 3 different times in 2015, prior to his conviction,