Star for the GT (44).
Star for the GT (44).
Motors. Not engine, mate.
The future. Automatic only.
So wtf is his opinion? Or is jalopnik just pushing me to skip the site and browse YouTube?
I hope he tones down a bit. I thoroughly enjoyed the whole show, except his portion. It seemed he was working very hard at acting. . . If his driving was on level with his acting, he wouldn’t be allowed to drive an ice cream truck.
The option he is talking about has to be approved to be given to a customer. Ferrari specifically notes it is not allowed on all electric over 3 MPH, and that they do NOT want people driving this as a zero emission (electric only) vehicle. So yes, the car is capable of it. . . If you somehow manage to convince…
I don’t understand why this [jalopnik] article exists. Yes, I can get a manual Quattroporte estate from Maserati, but this isn’t usual, basic from a dealer, or even a reasonable option. It merely “can exist.” I’m sure because your fact based response is fact based and against what this article tries to puff up, there…
Plausible, aerodynamicly speaking. The GT500 (worse aero for cooling, if I remember correctly) reliably broke 200 MPH with 662 HP, stock. A racer modified 5.0? Reliable? No. Plausible? Definitely. http://ecomodder.com/forum/tool-aero-rolling-resistance.php?Weight=3600&WeightUnits=lbs&CRR=.008&Cd=.36&FrontalArea=24&Fron…
Because seriously, you never know who will become president. No matter how ridiculous it seems.