So, you’re saying the requirements had no appreciable impact on women’s ability to have an abortion, and that 11% changed their minds after becoming better informed?
So, you’re saying the requirements had no appreciable impact on women’s ability to have an abortion, and that 11% changed their minds after becoming better informed?
“Hate crime” is a bullshit concept.
You don’t seem to understand what words mean, and your ability to reason is non-existent.
It doesn’t. The other poster is an imbecile.
Which woman/women, specifically, do you think were more deserving than those who were chosen?
He’s not wrong.
I’m neither poor, nor affronted, nor a child.
I’ve said is that there are certain things (e.g. gay sex, race-mixing) that it’s reprehensible to disapprove of.
Well, I’m certainly smarter than the typical Jezebel reader. I don’t think there’s any doubt about that.
It’s about as racist as most of the stuff you shitbags are offended by.
‘I don’t see how putting faith in the Bible is “about other people”’
That’s religion, not faith. Faith is personal. It’s not about other people.
The law passed 84-6.
So brace they didn’t bother to press charges or go public until the Billy Bush video guaranteed them their 15 minutes.
If he assaulted somebody, it should be in a court of law. Apparently the two accusers were content to let a predator roam free.
You’re a moron.
I guess you’re going to pretend they don’t regularly rail against police.
Facts?
What would be an example of “personal faith that looks reprehensible?”
Don’t confuse religion with faith.