It's kind of aggravating that a show with so many people who are genuinely funny improvisers has this recurring thing where they do improv that just isn't all that funny.

It's funny as having seen the episode, I didn't even think of reading the headline as meaning they break-up, but I could see it be an easy reading for someone that hadn't.

It would be easier to deal with her character if they hadn't retconned her partway through the season last year. The person she was before she turned horrible doesn't reconcile at all with the person she was after.

No. She was a successful model with a career in Milan and Paris before moving to New York City, where she didn't meet Trump for another two years. She made about $10,000 per modelling session at that stage of her career.

The 70s and 80s were a great era for TV shows with great opening credit sequences and thems and absolutely nothing else worth watching about them. They've found their ideal form as Youtube clips.

You've gotta take your heroes where you can find them.

Okay. Watched three episodes last night, and it is better so far. It's certainly still a cringey show, so I can see some people still hating it, but it's within my tolerance levels. They are doing better with making those cringey parts funny and/or interesting, as opposed to just unpleasant. And while the central…

According to the Facebook post, hey had an ESTA and then proceed to say that they weren't working here, they were just doing promotional events where they wouldn't get paid. That counts as work. Even attending a work-related convention counts a work. Playing a concert to boost sales of your album is work.

I had my problems with season one, but anybody that thought that the show was trying to sell that final kiss as some kind of happy ending was not watching.

All I am saying is that, as an immigrant to the United States, I find this particular case to be pretty much standard going back the '70s. I'm not saying nothing has changed under Trump, in fact I laid out why I am pissed at Trump in neighboring post.

They didn't have the proper paperwork. They just brought a letter from their label, thinking that meant something. Here is their own account.
https://www.facebook.com/so…

My issue with the actress plot was how abruptly she changed to suit the needs of the plot. They just flipped a switch when they needed to stop making her likeable, and she was a different person.

Glad to hear that they seem to have recalibrated a little. Last season was rough. I like just about everyone in it, but it was painful to watch, and not even painful in a dramatic, cathartic way.

Watching that trailer for "Rough Night" this week, all i could think was, "You have a wacky Australian woman in your movie and you cast Kate McKinnon with a phony accent instead of Claudia O'Doherty? Really?"

Sure. As a fellow human being, I do feel bad for them. I have had my bad experiences with immigration. I had to leave the US for three years at one point while going through paperwork to get a green card. It sucked.

Thanks. That is a fair point, and I genuinely appreciate you clarifying the terminology.

When you get a tourist visa, you are legally declaring that you have no intent to work. If you are lying about that, it's no different than lying on your tax form or lying in court. If you get caught, it is serious shit, so you don't want to fuck around with it.

I'm very familiar with the era. As an Australian, there is more a focus on the Pacific part of the war, as opposed to Americans, who tend to only think about the Nazis.

You get detained until they send you back when you enter a country illegally. It's an actual crime. That's nothing new.

As a non-American who lived in America, my only response to this story is "no shit". If you want to do business here, even if it just attending a convention, you need the right kind of visa.