Agreed that this is stupid and unnecessary. It’s as if they were trying to find controversial things where they don’t exist so they can very publicly fix them and show how sensitive they are.
balderdashian
balderdashian
I get master/slave. It isn’t really necessary at all, and more descriptive terms are actually better in most cases.
I have no issues with Kristen Bell and Dax Shepard owning a building and I think they’re being really good landlords by not charging rent for April. It’s decent and I wish my apartment complex would do the same.
Clinton actively supported Obama’s campaign after he was the presumptive nominee in 2008. Bernie not so much.
It’s also true that Bernie’s wife was telling his supporters to “vote their conscience” the day before the general election in 2016 rather than to vote for Clinton.
yes. the article says nothing about the 90% for a reason. what would that reason be?
irrelevant because it doesnt help you make your point. got it.
Dear god.. that is NOT how game streaming works, your level of ignorance is staggering here (don’t get me wrong, I hate everything about Stadia and game streaming services, but what you said is 100% false in every regard).
Don’t put your smarts in your TV. It’s not worth it for this exact reason. Get yourself a brand new Roku and you might have to replace it once every 7-10 years.
The monster is the airline. They created this artificial situation.
Counterpoint: If you expect someone who paid for a seat that reclines to not recline it because it inconveniences you, the monster is you.
“Non-sleeping hours” are not a thing, you have no idea what kind of schedule the other people on the plane are on. If someone worked the night shift (9pm-4am) then hopped on a 6am flight... guess what, they’ll probably want to sleep. Just the act of traveling all day and being forced to sit in a chair for hours can…
The question was what would he tell his black son to do in the case he was pulled over. This article pretends it’s his general response to racial injustice in America. I challenge someone here to answer this question in a meaningfully better way, considering that it is you giving advice to your black son.
Sure she could. It’s called grossing up.
There is a point where cash over the price of the car would cover the tax liabilities. If Oprah gave each audience member $9500 cash over the car that would 100% cover all taxes in current tax rates.
Because his Dad probably blew the money and then made up some “they fucked me over” story and his dumb ass believed it.
I understand your point on unexpected expenses, especially for those without means.
They could have said no to the car, or asked for a payment plan with the IRS, or sold/traded in the car and paid the taxes with the excess. Not sure how anyone was disadvantaged here.