Wish I had read your comment first because I basically said the same thing. But for sure.

It’s only subtle in that he doesn’t come right out and say “black” (or Negro or nigra or nigger...). It leaves him a little bit of a loophole (“I never said they should go watch polls in BLACK communities, I just said...”). In the past they might have came out and said “the Negro,” but that’s all that’s missing with…

Whomever gave him that little bit of debate advice (among others) fucked up. He looks like the creepy party sex stalker he is.

So is the media going to officially stop using the phrase “Is the thing that will end Donald Trump?” Because we have that answer now, so...

C’mon, you don’t know about the magical transformation that takes place when you say “I’m a Republican” three times? Your soul is cleansed, you see everyone else as going to hell, you gain instant knowledge of the “good parts” of the constitution and a bible magically appears in your pocket.

Not sure. Sudekis can play “good looking slick talking suave guy,” while Helms is “cautious, group’s voice of reason” guy.

That’s what I read somewhere. Not sure if it will hurt him with his folks, but my dream is that when he loses the election, all of this shit reduces him to doing infomercials at 2 a.m. selling some bullshit to the rubes who supported him.

All of this. My knowledge of Tubman was just of some old woman who knew some secret passages and got help from white folks. Nice I guess, but when I learned she carried a pistol and knew how to use it or that she led a raid that freed more than 700 slaves at one go by boat, the largest slave liberation in US…

At this point, it won’t make a difference. Him and his people will fall back on their “well others have said.”

Historically, a lot of slave women actively participated in the slave revolts because they had their own damned minds and stories.

Yup. There’s nothing clever or calculated about what he’s doing. The real secret is in the media not blasting him on his shit and digging up the truth. Only the Washington Post is doing some real digging, and even they’re late to the game. He’s benefitting from the paucity of reporters who used to love to dig at red…

including legacy media. Trump could have been stopped a year ago with this stuff, but there was too much investment in the ratings he generated;

Well, there’s supposedly a tape with him dropping the “n word” bomb so it that falls in the next day or so...

But he’ll be played by Mel Rodriguez in the inevitable HBO movie on this election cycle.

Within a family I could see it, but I fall more in the “like the attention” camp. Claiming you’re “undecided” in some of their eyes, they think it makes them look like a thoughtful person who isn’t rushed into a decision, blah blah blah.

I was hoping he was putting a hex on Trump.

This undecided crap is bullshit and I suspect just a way to get on television/get some attention. Seriously who the fuck is still not sure after everything that has been said in this election of ALL elections EVER? Plus the fact that some of the cheers that came from some in the audience at some of the shit Trump said…

I’m not even talking Oscar bound, just attempts at getting butts in the seats.

When you say “not as big a movie” what exactly do you mean? Being serious. Do you mean stars? Story? Just want to clarify. Thanks.

The other issues notwithstanding, was this film advertised as extensively as the average film? I think I saw maybe two legitimate ads on television for this (as opposed to television shows discussing it, interviewing the director or stars, etc.). Not saying that is a bigger reason for the lack of interest than maybe…