You can’t? I can: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/otherspo…

There you go: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/otherspo…

If you report to authorities, they have to investigate. Whether the investigation has the desired result leading to an indictment is a different question altogether.

I highly doubt that his lawyer promised to donate the money on her behalf. If her lawyers signed off on this, they’d be liable for gross incompetence. Lol

Could you name/identify the robber and if so, did he get convicted without any further ado? No witnesses, no video evidence, no valuables found, no dna, no fingerprints needed? Just your word to get the perp behind bars? That’s the burden of proof.

It was YOU who challenged the principle b/c it isn’t perfect. That makes no sense and I pointed that out. Nothing more, nothing less. Or did you not, then what did you mean by “the existence of such a principle means it is always practiced”?

That’s a strange logic. Should we do away with a principle, simply b/c some fail to adhere to it all the time? Do you understand what burdening the defendant with the proof of innocence would actually mean? Just take a look at totalitarian countries like China, where authorities can accuse every citizen about…

Are you telling me that this well earning moviestar and wife of a multi millionaire has never cared to donate to charities in the past? I guess that explains a lot.

Care to elaborate?

One of the candidates refers to women as ‘females’, while the other is surprised that “the community put two girls forward”. Isn’t that enough undermining for you?

Isn’t it strange that she did not name any specific charity she wants to donate to in her carefully drafted statement? Oh well, let’s just wait and see.

The burden of proof is put upon the victim and there’s often a bias toward innocence,

What are you implying? I never qualified the pic. I guess it works as some kind of Rorschach test for commenters like you. Interesting!

Agreed, but it’s Ryan Lochte we’re talking about. There’s more going on on top of his head than inside of it. That report was probably as accurate as it gets for him.

If you put out a statement vowing to donate the money to a charity and you don’t follow through, what does that make you? Nobody forced her to make that statement.

Gosh, I guess more of this and Amber might not get a hold of the $7 million she plans on spending vowed to donate (to what charity?).

Of course it would, but it’s still a crime, isn’t it? LA authorities telling Brazilian tourists that the robbery was all their fault, cuz they should have known about Compton would garner a lot of negative attention in Brazil, wouldn’t it? Besides, do we know where the alleged robbery actually took place? I heard they…

I googled them too

Is there a provision in Brazilian law that makes it somehow legal to rob tourists in a red light district? Doing blow and picking up hookers can be a tourist-y thing, depending on the tourist.

Amber Heard: ‘I’ve been abused and I want the world to know. It’s not about the money. He must be held responsible for his actions. Oh, ok, I’ll take the money but I will donate it, cross my heart (and hope to die).’