Someone did up above, but I'm glad to see other people's brains went where mine did :P

I was hoping to find something like this here :D

I had that! And my cousin had Castle Greyskull, so it was pretty great when we got together.

I've occasionally gone the men's room in those cases. Then again, I'm a fast pee-er, and it usually takes me longer to get into the bathroom than it does to actually use it. It's probably the people with kids who are holding up the line.

He sounds just lovely.

Exactly!

"Not attractive at all"? What kind of impossible standards do you have? I think she looks cute there. Different than she does now, certainly, but she was definitely pretty.

So far this is pretty much the only thing I've seen that looks really good. Charlize's dress (and a few of the others here) almost works, but seems ill-fitting. But this gray dress is nice.

Low-budget sci-fi movie costume.

I was on board when I thought this was a dress, but this was about where I went "Wait...nope."

Yes! That they don't even have their facts right, yet are able to make a decision with the potential to affect a lot of women, really makes this scary.

Too many people buy into the myth that those who receive assistance aren't working (and, therefore, also paying taxes). People like that are so far removed from low-wage jobs that they don't realize how little that pay can cover, even if you're living frugally.

Yes—this, exactly. It makes far more sense to keep a vehicle you know has worked well for you than to trade it in for an unknown quantity.

They're operating under the delusion that food stamps are their OWN money and that, as such, they have a say in how it's spent. Never mind that most people getting SNAP have also paid into the system (and are usually working while getting assistance, too).

I feel the same way. To me, it seems like you'd have to be watching someone pretty closely, possibly even straining to look, to see what someone pays with. Why? What's the point? Don't they have anything better to do? And what difference does it make to them, anyway? I'm usually too busy loading my stuff onto…

I forgot that I'd read this before until reading it here again. It makes a lot of sense. Being poor can get awfully expensive.

She did. I saw her on CNN last night and she said she had a ninety-minute commute to and from work. It just makes sense to keep a car you know works well, rather than risking one that might end up being a lemon.

The woman this story is about was on WIC, not food stamps/SNAP. They don't have that rule.

Exactly. It makes far more economic sense to hold on to a vehicle you know is reliable than to take a chance on an unknown quantity.

How is a five-year-old vehicle that was purchased (according to her) before she and her husband even got together "the latest car"? Also, she wasn't carrying an EBT card, she was getting WIC, which is a different program.